GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › GRIN · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

GRIN

108Judge labels
12First choices
48Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Influencer for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 79 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 39% of its 38 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named GRIN for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Influencer platformsMarketing10%3 of 7939%38criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GRIN yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GRIN across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash02035
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast31026
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash11046
Llama 4 Maverick20002
Qwen 3.7 Flash03014
Kimi K202024
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.501113

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labelsNone
Paraphrase19 labels3
Comparative30 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained17 labels4
Scale-constrained14 labels5
Negative17 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative108 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“GRIN/Aspire focus on end-to-end workflows like gifting and payments (ideal for scaling DTC)... Choose based on your scale (e.g., GRIN for 50+ creators)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Influencer · comparative prompt · first choice
“The top influencer marketing platforms include GRIN, Upfluence, and CreatorIQ for comprehensive, AI-driven campaign management.” Llama 4 Maverick · Influencer · comparative prompt · first choice
“the recommended creator and influencer management tool for a mid-sized B2B company is GRIN” Llama 4 Maverick · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“All-in-one mid-market/DTC | GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence | ... sweet spot for your size” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Do not sign an expensive annual contract with a legacy B2C influencer platform (like GRIN or CreatorIQ).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · direct prompt · hard negative
“What to skip: GRIN, Aspire, CreatorIQ, and Upfluence are excellent but built for B2C/e-commerce” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · direct prompt · hard negative
“GRIN | Built for DTC/ecommerce (Shopify-centric)... don't map well to B2B sales cycles” Kimi K2 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“What to avoid: ... GRIN ... primarily designed for B2C/e-commerce use cases” MiniMax M2.5 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GRIN, over the 108 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GRIN was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CreatorIQ85 of 10829Not in the top three
Upfluence73 of 1081Not in the top three
Aspire69 of 1083Not in the top three
Modash58 of 10811Not in the top three
Traackr51 of 1088Not in the top three
HypeAuditor30 of 1081Not in the top three
Heepsy25 of 1082Not in the top three
Shopify Collabs23 of 1084Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GRIN. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 108 answers that named GRIN and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

upfluence.com6
creatoriq.com5
grin.coYour site5
guideflow.com5
influencermarketinghub.com5
modash.io5
toolradar.com4
archive.com3
aspire.io3
kolsquare.com3

Thirty-nine of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming GRIN came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as GRIN

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GRIN; a claim can dispute any of them.
Grin 8GRIN/Aspire 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GRIN's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GRIN, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at grin.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.