AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Traackr · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Traackr

100Judge labels
12First choices
31Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Influencer for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Traackr →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Traackr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Influencer platformsMarketing5%8 of 7223%30accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Traackr held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Influencer · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 78 → 72 of 72
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 9 → 8 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 17% → 17%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 2 of 59, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Influencer2%6%▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 8 of 72

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Traackr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar10102
Grok 4.2012115
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash02114
Llama 4 Maverick00112
Qwen 3.7 Flash01113
Kimi K202103
GLM 4.7 FlashX11013
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B02013

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels8
Paraphrase16 labels4
Comparative23 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative23 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative100 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Traackr as the best overall creator/influencer management tool” Perplexity Sonar · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best overall influencer‑marketing platform is Traackr” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Pick for Most Mid-Market B2B: Traackr” Grok 4.20 · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose this if you're a *larger* mid-size company (100+ employees) needing enterprise-grade measurement... Expect higher costs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Why to avoid: One of the most expensive influencer marketing platforms on the market” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Influencer · negative prompt · hard negative
“inaccurate location data (seen in some G2 reviews for platforms like Traackr or Upfluence, though they're not outright "avoid")” Grok 4.20 · Influencer · negative prompt · soft negative
“platforms with limited discovery capabilities, such as Traackr, may not be ideal for brands” Llama 4 Maverick · Influencer · negative prompt · soft negative
“you want to avoid expensive, enterprise-level SaaS tools (like GRIN, Aspire, or Traackr)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Traackr, over the 100 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Traackr was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GRIN57 of 1006Compare →
Aspire46 of 1000Not among the top eight
Modash34 of 1004Not among the top eight
Meltwater20 of 1000Not among the top eight
HypeAuditor16 of 1000Not among the top eight
Heepsy13 of 1001Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Traackr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 95 of the 100 answers that named Traackr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

archive.com46
favikon.com43
influencermarketinghub.com43
g2.com42
guideflow.com42
toptal.com42
modash.io38
skrapp.io34
influenceflow.io32
dashsocial.com30

392 of the 392 domain citations in answers naming Traackr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

traackr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Traackr takes 5% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“traackr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
33 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,383 a month
Searches its site ranks for
733 · 69 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,596
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 6 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2024, as Traackr, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 8 of 72 in influencer
Segment leader
23%
Favikon
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
100 answers
Its own site cited
in 95 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on traackr.com
484
subdomains included
Content
75
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Podcast or video31undated
Case study29undated
Conference or event5undated
Webinar or virtual event3undated
Blog2undatedInfluencer
Comparison2undated
Glossary or explainer2undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page traackr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Traackr

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Traackr is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered influencer marketing platform
For
top-performing brands
Price stated
Request pricing and plans traackr.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2SOC 2 Type II
Customers named
DanoneLaneigeMCoBeautyLaboratoires Pierre FabreCoty
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Traackr's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: traackr.com, traackr.com/pricing, trust.traackr.com, traackr.com/clients/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Traackr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Traackr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Traackr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Traackr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Traackr, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at traackr.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.