Every category where a model named Traackr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	2%	9 of 79	23%	22	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Traackr yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Traackr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	2	3
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct21 labels3

Paraphrase16 labels2

Comparative15 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained9 labels3

Negative16 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative84 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CreatorIQ or Traackr: These are the industry standards for large-scale enterprise marketing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · scale prompt · first choice

“Custom attribution models connecting influencer activity to pipeline, but pricing is enterprise-only” MiniMax M2.5 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Enterprise-leaning brands focused purely on relationship management and benchmarking” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · scale prompt · alternative

“Traackr tracks 7+ million influencers across 71 countries and 26 languages” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Influencer · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“often significantly more expensive and complex to implement than Favikon” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“Very expensive, enterprise-focused, overkill for mid-sized” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“for a mid-market firm, they are often "overkill."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · direct prompt · soft negative

“Overkill/costly for mid-market.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Influencer · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Traackr, over the 84 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Traackr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CreatorIQ72 of 8425Not in the top three

GRIN51 of 844Not in the top three

Aspire39 of 841Not in the top three

Upfluence35 of 840Not in the top three

Modash27 of 845Not in the top three

Favikon26 of 8414Not in the top three

HypeAuditor13 of 840Not in the top three

Klear12 of 840Not in the top three

Meltwater12 of 840Not in the top three

impact.com11 of 841Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Traackr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 84 answers that named Traackr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com9

influencermarketinghub.com9

skrapp.io9

archive.com8

influee.co7

influenceflow.io6

sproutsocial.com6

kolsquare.com5

linkedin.com5

toolradar.com5

Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Traackr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

skrapp.io/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms9

guideflow.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms8

archive.com/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platforms-b2b7

influee.co/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms7

influencermarketinghub.com/top-influencer-marketing-platforms7

kolsquare.com/en/blog/what-are-the-best-platforms-for-influencer-marketing5

toolradar.com/guides/best-influencer-marketing-platforms5

bringseo.com/top-b2b-influencer-platforms-in-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Traackr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Traackr; a claim can dispute any of them.

Traackr/CreatorIQ 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Traackr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Traackr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at traackr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.