Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 79 → 71 of 72
1 category · RankedCreatorIQ
116Judge labels
28First choices
25Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
47% in Influencer for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 27 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CreatorIQ →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business76 of 77
0%19 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market6 of 72
5%27 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 61
47%69 labels
endorsed leader
In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CreatorIQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer platforms | Marketing | 5% | 6 of 72 | 11% | 27 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CreatorIQ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Influencer · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 5 → 6 of 71
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
49%from 53% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 59, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer | 8% | 6% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 8% → 6%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 6 of 72 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CreatorIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CreatorIQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels6
Paraphrase22 labels9
Comparative29 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels7
Scale-constrained16 labels6
Negative18 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative116 labels in all, every segment counted; 28 of the 46 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd generally recommend CreatorIQ if your priority is serious creator program management, governance, integrations, and scaling B2B-style campaigns” GPT-5.4 mini · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“CreatorIQ | Complex, global teams needing heavy governance... (Gold standard for enterprise).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · scale prompt · first choice
“CreatorIQ's enterprise-grade analytics and attribution capabilities are unmatched.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Influencer · comparative prompt · first choice
“prioritize GRIN, Upfluence, CreatorIQ for your size” Grok 4.20 · Influencer · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Traditional platforms like GRIN, CreatorIQ, or Upfluence are built primarily for Instagram, TikTok, and lifestyle creators.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · direct prompt · soft negative
“require custom quotes that often start at $20,000+/year, putting them out of reach for many mid-size teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Overkill for mid‑size teams; steep learning curve and higher minimum spend” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Influencer · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CreatorIQ, over the 116 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CreatorIQ was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CreatorIQ, over the 116 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CreatorIQ was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CreatorIQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 110 of the 116 answers that named CreatorIQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
archive.com47
guideflow.com44
influencermarketinghub.com42
toptal.com37
dashsocial.com34
favikon.com34
g2.com34
modash.io32
influencer-hero.com29
meltwater.com29
362 of the 362 domain citations in answers naming CreatorIQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
creatoriq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CreatorIQ takes 5% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
creatoriq.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CreatorIQ takes 5% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“creatoriq”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 82 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,166 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,981 · 97 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,330
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 17 clicks and $144 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 6 of 72 in influencer
Segment leader
23%
Favikon
- First choices
- 28 across its categories
- Named in
- 116 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 110 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on creatoriq.com
1,121
subdomains included
Content
934
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 435 | undated | Influencer, CRM | ||
| Podcast or video | 143 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 120 | 0 | 2022-10-05 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 81 | 0 | 2023-07-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 68 | undated | Influencer | ||
| News or press | 50 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | Influencer | |
| Case study | 32 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-06-06 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-10Creator powered funnel report 2026 news or press
- 2026-03-31Sprinklr and CreatorIQ Announce Strategic Partnership to Unify Creator, Organic, and Paid Social Media news or press
- 2026-03-26Creatoriq deepens partnership with youtube with integration unlocking audience insights for smarter creator campaigns news or press
- 2026-03-23Creatoriq appoints senthil kumaran chief technology officer news or press
- 2026-01-21State of creator compensation news or press
- 2025-12-17Creatoriq leader in idc marketscape worldwide influencer marketing platforms news or press
Events in person
Last twelve months
- reported September 2026CreatorIQ Connect NYNew York City · hosted
As the event pages on creatoriq.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page creatoriq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow CreatorIQ
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CreatorIQ is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CreatorIQ is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Creator Marketing at Scale; "the operating system for creator-led growth"; "CreatorIQ powers the world’s leading brands with AI-driven intelligence and unified workflows to scale creator-led growth—safely, seamlessly, and at scale."
- For
- brands and agencies; enterprise teams
- Price stated
- Pricing creatoriq.com
- Free plan or trial
- Request a free demo today. creatoriq.com/customer-stories
- Certifications
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certified
- Customers named
- NestléMoose ToysKIKO MilanoIONSanDiskNestlé Health ScienceSpace NKBurson
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What CreatorIQ's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: creatoriq.com, creatoriq.com/pricing-request-modal, creatoriq.com/trust, creatoriq.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CreatorIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CreatorIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CreatorIQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CreatorIQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CreatorIQ, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.