1 category · RankedCreatorIQ
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer platforms | Marketing | 8% | 5 of 79 | 41% | 37 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. CreatorIQ - Best for: Large enterprise brands and agencies managing global programs ... Enterprise-grade with mature analytics” Mistral Small · Influencer · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose CreatorIQ if you are a large corporate brand or agency requiring maximum security, enterprise governance, and global scaling.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · comparative prompt · first choice
“CreatorIQ — strong for governance, integrations, reporting depth, security, and multi-team operations” MiniMax M2.5 · Influencer · scale prompt · first choice
“CreatorIQ or Traackr: These are the industry standards for large-scale enterprise marketing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“What to avoid: Most mainstream tools like CreatorIQ, GRIN, and Upfluence are primarily designed for B2C/e-commerce” MiniMax M2.5 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“What I'd Avoid for B2B ... CreatorIQ | Powerful but genuinely enterprise-grade; overkill and overpriced for mid-market B2B” Kimi K2 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Do not sign an expensive annual contract with a legacy B2C influencer platform (like GRIN or CreatorIQ).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · direct prompt · hard negative
“Aspire, Upfluence, CreatorIQ \u2014 typically $2,000+ per month with annual contracts” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 120 answers that named CreatorIQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Fifty-six of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming CreatorIQ came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as CreatorIQ
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CreatorIQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CreatorIQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at creatoriq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.