Every category where a model named Favikon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	27%	1 of 79	0%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Favikon yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Favikon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	1	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels17

Paraphrase19 labels12

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For pure B2B thought leadership, Favikon is often the sweet spot for mid-market companies balancing cost and functionality.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice

“the strongest single-platform pick is usually Favikon if your program is LinkedIn-first” Perplexity Sonar · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Favikon if your priority is B2B creator discovery on LinkedIn” Perplexity Sonar · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Favikon stands out as the top recommendation for most mid-market B2B teams” Grok 4.1 Fast · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Favikon, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Favikon was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CreatorIQ28 of 528Not in the top three

GRIN26 of 522Compare →

Traackr26 of 522Not in the top three

Modash23 of 523Not in the top three

Aspire19 of 522Not in the top three

Upfluence14 of 520Not in the top three

Onalytica10 of 521Not in the top three

Skrapp8 of 521Not in the top three

Afluencer8 of 520Compare →

Influencity8 of 520Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Favikon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 52 answers that named Favikon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

skrapp.io11

archive.com8

guideflow.com8

influencermarketinghub.com7

bringseo.com5

directiveconsulting.com5

favikon.comYour site5

kolsquare.com5

amt.ai4

influencity.com4

Fifty-seven of the sixty-two domain citations in answers naming Favikon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

skrapp.io/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms11

archive.com/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platforms-b2b8

guideflow.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms6

bringseo.com/top-b2b-influencer-platforms-in-20265

favikon.com/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platforms5

kolsquare.com/en/blog/what-are-the-best-platforms-for-influencer-marketing5

influencermarketinghub.com/b2b-influencer-marketing-platforms4

influencermarketinghub.com/top-influencer-marketing-platforms4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Favikon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Favikon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at favikon.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.