Every category where a model named Heepsy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	0%	21 of 79	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Heepsy yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Heepsy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	2	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative11 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Safer alternatives: Modash/Heepsy for discovery (strong authenticity tools)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Influencer · negative prompt · first choice

“Affordable Entry-Level Subscription: Heepsy ... one of the most cost-effective ways to vet talent” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

“Heepsy — often described as the cheapest genuine entry point, with a free tier” GPT-5.4 mini · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

“cited as budget-friendly discovery tools, though they are not free” Perplexity Sonar · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Heepsy, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Heepsy was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GRIN25 of 334Not in the top three

Modash24 of 332Not in the top three

Aspire23 of 332Not in the top three

Upfluence22 of 333Not in the top three

Afluencer21 of 335Not in the top three

Shopify Collabs19 of 331Not in the top three

CreatorIQ17 of 332Not in the top three

HypeAuditor15 of 330Not in the top three

Collabstr13 of 334Not in the top three

Influencity10 of 330Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Heepsy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 33 answers that named Heepsy and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com3

influee.co3

influencermarketinghub.com3

learn.g2.com3

sproutsocial.com3

archive.com2

customers.ai2

hypeauditor.com2

iqfluence.io2

litcommerce.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Heepsy came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms3

influencermarketinghub.com/micro-influencer-platform3

learn.g2.com/free-influencer-marketing-platforms3

sproutsocial.com/insights/influencer-marketing-platforms3

archive.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms-small-business2

customers.ai/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platform-for-small-business2

hypeauditor.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms-for-small-businesses-running-on-tight-2

influencermarketinghub.com/top-influencer-marketing-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Heepsy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Heepsy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at heepsy.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.