Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 7 of 72
1 category · RankedHeepsy
41Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Influencer for small business buyers
Rank 16 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Heepsy →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 77
2%24 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market16 of 72
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise58 of 61
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Heepsy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer platforms | Marketing | 0% | 16 of 72 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Heepsy held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Influencer · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 16 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 51 of 59
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 16 of 72 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Heepsy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Heepsy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative13 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative41 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Other budget-friendly options include Heepsy, which is noted for affordable creator discovery and fake follower detection” Mistral Small · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative
“upgrade to Heepsy (~$89/month) which offers the best balance of features and affordability” Kimi K2 · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Manual Discovery: Heepsy ... Heepsy is a strong contender.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative
“### 2. Heepsy - Free plan available (with limitations)” MiniMax M2.5 · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Shady cancellation practices (still billing after cancellation)” Kimi K2 · Influencer · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Heepsy, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Heepsy was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Heepsy, over the 41 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Heepsy was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Heepsy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 41 answers that named Heepsy and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com31
dashsocial.com29
shopify.com24
g2.com17
toptal.com17
guideflow.com16
scrumball.com16
influenceflow.io14
afluencer.com11
blog.hypeauditor.com11
186 of the 186 domain citations in answers naming Heepsy came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
heepsy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Heepsy takes 0% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
heepsy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Heepsy takes 0% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“heepsy”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,674 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,602 · 97 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,241
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 72 in influencer
Segment leader
23%
Favikon
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 41 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 40 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on heepsy.com
10,002
subdomains included
Content
286
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
8 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 220 | undated | Influencer, SEO | ||
| News or press | 22 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 18 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 11 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page heepsy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Heepsy
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Heepsy is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Heepsy is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- An influencer marketing platform that helps brands and agencies run creator campaigns on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and LinkedIn.
- For
- brands and agencies
- Price stated
- Start free and stay free until you need more. Paid plans scale as your program grows, billed monthly or annually with no lock-in. heepsy.com
- Starting price
- $69 a month billed annually heepsy.com
- Free plan or trial
- You can start for free with no demo required. heepsy.com
- Integrations claimed
- 2 heepsy.com/pricing
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting, customers
What Heepsy's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: heepsy.com, heepsy.com, heepsy.com/pricing, heepsy.com/use-cases/b2b. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Heepsy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Heepsy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Heepsy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Heepsy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Heepsy, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.