Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 53 of 72
1 category · RankedInfluencity
25Judge labels
4First choices
4Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Influencer for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Influencity →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business41 of 77
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market5 of 72
7%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise24 of 61
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Influencity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer platforms | Marketing | 7% | 5 of 72 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Influencity held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Influencer · by segment
Mid-market▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 8 → 4 of 71
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 22 of 59
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influencer | 2% | 8% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 5 of 72 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Influencity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Influencity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels3
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Favikon (if LinkedIn is your primary focus) or Influencity (for a more general platform with good B2B capabilities)” MiniMax M2.5 · Influencer · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Influencity – Best Overall Balance for Mid-Market ... the sweet spot for mid-market businesses” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice
“Modash and Influencity are the top choices” Mistral Small · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is Influencity” Perplexity Sonar · Influencer · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Influencity, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Influencity was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Influencity, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Influencity was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Influencity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 25 answers that named Influencity and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com16
favikon.com13
influencermarketinghub.com9
linkedin.com9
g2.com8
skrapp.io8
archive.com7
learn.g2.com7
influee.co6
modash.io6
Eighty-nine of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming Influencity came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
influencity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Influencity takes 7% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.ShowHide
Search and answers
influencity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Influencity takes 7% of first choices and Favikon takes 23%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best influencer marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“influencity”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 99,306 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 14,112 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,332 · 159 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,300
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 23 clicks and $217 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
7%
rank 5 of 72 in influencer
Segment leader
23%
Favikon
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 24 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on influencity.com
1,231
subdomains included
Content
31
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
2 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 12 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | undated | |||
| Blog | 6 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page influencity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Influencity
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Influencity is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Influencity is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Best Influencer Marketing Platform
- For
- brands and agencies
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial influencity.com
- Hosting
- Worldwide
- Customers named
- Passport EntertainmentCaptivate InfluenceDentsuBeyond Media AgencyCheil SpainBokksu
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications
What Influencity's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: influencity.com, influencity.com/platform/tiktok-influencers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Influencity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Influencity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Influencity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Influencity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Influencity, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.