Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 12 of 40
2 categories · Named, not rankedSwarmify
7Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Swarmify was named 3 times in Video hosting and 1 other category, where Wistia led with 51%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 41
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 47
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In video hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Swarmify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video marketing and hosting | Marketing | 0% | 18 of 47 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Wistia at 51% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 0% | 37 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Swarmify held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Video hosting · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 16 of 43
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video hosting | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 18 of 47 |
| Webinars | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Swarmify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Swarmify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Other options to consider include Livestorm, Swarmify, and Whova.” Llama 4 Maverick · Webinars · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For High Performance & Speed: Swarmify (SmartVideo).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video hosting · negative prompt · alternative
“Gumlet/Swarmify (fast, private embeds) avoid these pitfalls” Grok 4.20 · Video hosting · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Swarmify, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Swarmify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Swarmify, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Swarmify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Swarmify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Swarmify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
swarmify.comYour site7
gumlet.com5
apollotechnical.com3
cloudinary.com3
guideflow.com3
learn.g2.com3
livestorm.co3
cinema8.com2
help.vimeo.com2
vidyard.com2
Twenty-six of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Swarmify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
swarmify.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Swarmify takes 0% of first choices and Wistia takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
swarmify.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Swarmify takes 0% of first choices and Wistia takes 51%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video hosting platform for marketing”
2
Position for “best video hosting platform for marketing”
–
not in the top ten
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 47 in video hosting
Segment leader
51%
Wistia
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on swarmify.com
10,000
subdomains included
Content
9,802
counted in the table below
Documentation
103
Product · Integration
28 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 9,555 | 19 | 2026-09-22 | SEO, Direct mail | |
| Comparison | 160 | 1 | 2026-07-02 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 44 | 1 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Case study | 12 | 0 | 2013-01-01 | SEO | |
| Report or ebook | 12 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 8 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 6 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Free lower thirds templates blog
- 2026-09-21Video hosting egress pricing compared blog
- 2026-09-18Free video overlay websites blog
- 2026-09-14Video encoding storage multiplier blog
- 2026-09-11Free animated logo templates blog
- 2026-09-08Vidyard pricing for website video blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page swarmify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Swarmify
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Swarmify; a claim can dispute any of them.
Swarmify (SmartVideo) 1
Follow Swarmify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Swarmify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Swarmify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Ad-free video hosting for websites
- For
- websites
- Price stated
- Plans from $19/mo swarmify.com
- Starting price
- 19 swarmify.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial · Card required, no charge until day 15 swarmify.com
- Hosting
- United States (multi-region)EU (Germany, Finland)USglobal CDN edge locations
- Customers named
- Skyward SEOProficiens AcademyPizzaTVEndorsalWhite JacobsProdigiIgnite ImagesWhite Jacobs & Associates
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications
What Swarmify's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: swarmify.com, swarmify.com/pricing, swarmify.com/security, swarmify.com/features, swarmify.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Swarmify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Swarmify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Swarmify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Swarmify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Swarmify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.