GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Cloudflare Stream · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Cloudflare Stream

16Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cloudflare Stream was named 4 times in Video hosting, where Wistia led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In video hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cloudflare Stream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video marketing and hostingMarketing0%11 of 560%4under 10 labels · led by Wistia at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cloudflare Stream yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cloudflare Stream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Use Mux or Cloudflare Stream - Great APIs and integration capabilities” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video hosting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cloudflare Stream, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudflare Stream was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wistia16 of 169Not in the top three
Vimeo15 of 161Not in the top three
Brightcove13 of 163Not in the top three
Vidyard12 of 163Not in the top three
YouTube12 of 162Not in the top three
Gumlet7 of 160Not in the top three
Kaltura7 of 160Not in the top three
Mux6 of 160Not in the top three
Dailymotion5 of 160Not in the top three
Loom5 of 160Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cloudflare Stream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 16 answers that named Cloudflare Stream and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apollotechnical.com1
blog.hubspot.com1
dacast.com1
dupple.com1
ecommerceparadise.com1
fast.io1
goldcast.io1
guideflow.com1
gumlet.com1
ignite.video1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Cloudflare Stream came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Cloudflare is the company behind Cloudflare Stream.
Website
cloudflare.com
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2009
Employees
about 3,217 (2022)
Ownership
Public, NET on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudflare Stream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudflare Stream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cloudflare.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack