AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Stape · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Stape

5Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Stape was named 4 times in Tag management, where Google Tag Manager led with 81%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In tag management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Stape for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Tag managementGTM data and infrastructure0%11 of 670%4under 10 labels · led by Google Tag Manager at 81%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Stape held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Tag management · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 21 of 36
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 10 of 56
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Tag management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 24 → 11 of 67

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Stape across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“JENTIS or Stape (server-side GTM hosting) | Offer free/low-cost server-side options, but may have usage caps.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Tag management · budget prompt · alternative
“host it through a managed middleman like Stape.io or Addingwell” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Tag management · direct prompt · alternative
“Helps move tag processing server-side for more control and performance” Perplexity Sonar · Tag management · comparative prompt · alternative
“For Server-Side Performance & Budget-Conscious Teams: Stape” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Tag management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Stape, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Stape was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Google Tag Manager5 of 55Not among the top eight
Piwik PRO Tag Manager5 of 50Not among the top eight
Tealium iQ Tag Management4 of 50Not among the top eight
Adobe Experience Platform Tags3 of 50Not among the top eight
Addingwell1 of 50Not among the top eight
Adobe Real-Time CDP1 of 50Not among the top eight
CHEQ Manage1 of 50Not among the top eight
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager1 of 50Not among the top eight
Cookiebot1 of 50Not among the top eight
Ensighten1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Stape. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Stape and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkthat.ai4
g2.com4
observepoint.com4
usercentrics.com4
guideflow.com3
6sense.com2
gartner.com2
itechguides.com2
omr.com2
piwik.pro2

Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Stape came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on stape.io
10,002
subdomains included
Content
769
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,085
Product · Integration
335 · 1,113
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog481172026-09-28CRM, Enrichment
Report or ebook94undatedCRM
News or press6442026-09-21Mobile apps
Case study3042026-08-25
Webinar or virtual event2922026-09-11CRM
Comparison2512026-09-25CDP, CRM
Glossary or explainer2302024-07-15
Conference or event1602026-05-01
Template or tool702020-06-19

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page stape.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (11); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Stape

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Stape; a claim can dispute any of them.
Stape/server-side tagging platforms 1

Follow Stape

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Stape is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Stape is a cost-effective alternative to GCP, offering easy setup, a rich feature set, and expert support for your tracking needs.
For
organizations of every scale, whether you’re running a small site, managing dozens of client setups, or operating enterprise-level infrastructure
Price stated
We offer the same setup at just $20/month ($100 per month for sites with more than 500,000 requests/month). stape.io/gtm-server-hosting
Free plan or trial
No credit card required. stape.io/gtm-server-hosting
Certifications
ISO 27001:2022SOC 2HIPAADORAGDPRUS Data PrivacyCCPAAWS Foundational Technical Review
Hosting
US Center (Iowa)US East (South Carolina)US West (Oregon)EU West (Belgium)EU North (Finland)EU North (England)EU Center (Germany)AP East (Singapore)
Customers named
ZweiDigitalHerzlackEykZumnordePeak MetricsROI AssistASENTOWoodUpp
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Stape's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: stape.io/gtm-server-hosting, stape.io, stape.io/solutions/api, stape.io/blog/category/case-studies, stape.io/helpdesk/documentation/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Stape's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Stape, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Stape by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Stape is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Stape, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at stape.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.