GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Social Cat · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Social Cat

8Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Social Cat was named 3 times in Influencer, where Favikon led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business26 of 80

under the label threshold

Mid-market37 of 79

under the label threshold

Enterprise58 of 62

under the label threshold

In influencer · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Social Cat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	0%	37 of 79	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Favikon at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Social Cat yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Social Cat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you have a physical product and want high-volume postings: Go with Social Cat.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Social Cat, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Social Cat was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Aspire7 of 80Not in the top three

Collabstr6 of 82Not in the top three

Shopify Collabs6 of 81Not in the top three

CreatorIQ6 of 80Not in the top three

GRIN6 of 80Not in the top three

Afluencer5 of 80Not in the top three

Modash4 of 81Not in the top three

Upfluence3 of 81Not in the top three

Heepsy3 of 80Not in the top three

Ainfluencer2 of 82Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Social Cat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 8 answers that named Social Cat and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com1

businessofapps.com1

favikon.com1

guideflow.com1

influee.co1

influencermarketinghub.com1

influencity.com1

joinbrands.com1

kolsquare.com1

later.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Social Cat came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/influencer-platforms1

businessofapps.com/marketplace/influencer-marketing/platforms1

favikon.com/blog/best-influencer-marketing-platforms1

guideflow.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms1

influee.co/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms1

influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-platforms-for-creators1

influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-platforms-usa1

influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-marketing-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Social Cat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Social Cat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socialcat.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.