Every category where a model named Ainfluencer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	10%	4 of 79	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Favikon at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ainfluencer yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ainfluencer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels6

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If I had to pick one for a tight budget, I'd lean toward Ainfluencer because it is listed as free for brands with no subscription or platform fees” GPT-5.4 mini · Influencer · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have zero budget to spend on software... Ainfluencer is one of the best choices.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with Ainfluencer (free) to test the waters” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with Ainfluencer (free) or Afluencer (free forever)” Mistral Small · Influencer · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Trustpilot shows low ratings (around 2/5) with complaints of bugs, non-existent support, fake/random Instagram accounts” Grok 4.1 Fast · Influencer · negative prompt · hard negative

“Ainfluencer — High Risk ... significant credibility issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ainfluencer, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ainfluencer was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Afluencer13 of 151Not in the top three

Collabstr10 of 151Not in the top three

GRIN10 of 150Not in the top three

Modash9 of 152Not in the top three

Heepsy9 of 151Not in the top three

Intellifluence8 of 150Not in the top three

Shopify Collabs8 of 150Not in the top three

Upfluence8 of 150Not in the top three

Aspire7 of 150Not in the top three

HypeAuditor6 of 151Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ainfluencer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 15 answers that named Ainfluencer and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

influencermarketinghub.com1

upfluence.com1

Two of the two domain citations in answers naming Ainfluencer came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

influencermarketinghub.com/influencer-apps1

influencermarketinghub.com/micro-influencer-platform1

upfluence.com/influencer-marketing/best-influencer-marketing-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ainfluencer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ainfluencer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ainfluencer.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.