Every category where a model named Collabstr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Influencer platforms	Marketing	2%	12 of 79	18%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Collabstr yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Collabstr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative13 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Collabstr is a market leader... You pay zero subscription fees and get content with transparent, upfront pricing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · first choice

“Look for platforms that offer month-to-month pricing or pay-as-you-go models (like Modash, Collabstr, or Promoty).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Influencer · negative prompt · first choice

“Occasional Campaigns? Use Collabstr so you don't get stuck with recurring bills.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Influencer · budget prompt · alternative

“Other notable platforms are Collabstr for quick, vetted influencer hiring” Llama 4 Maverick · Influencer · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Collabstr — Use with Caution While not universally condemned, there are recurring concerns” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Influencer · negative prompt · soft negative

“not necessarily bad platforms, but several are described as a poor fit” Perplexity Sonar · Influencer · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Collabstr, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Collabstr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GRIN21 of 321Not in the top three

Afluencer20 of 322Not in the top three

Modash19 of 323Not in the top three

Aspire18 of 320Not in the top three

Upfluence17 of 321Not in the top three

CreatorIQ16 of 323Not in the top three

HypeAuditor15 of 321Not in the top three

Heepsy13 of 322Not in the top three

Shopify Collabs12 of 321Not in the top three

Ainfluencer10 of 323Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Collabstr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 32 answers that named Collabstr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

influee.co4

getflowbox.com3

guideflow.com3

toolradar.com3

aspire.io2

brandchamp.io2

businessofapps.com2

devopsschool.com2

influenceflow.io2

insense.pro2

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Collabstr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

influee.co/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms4

getflowbox.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms3

guideflow.com/blog/influencer-marketing-platforms3

toolradar.com/guides/best-influencer-marketing-platforms3

aspire.io/blog/pros-and-cons-influencer-marketplace2

brandchamp.io/blog/biggest-problems-with-influencer-marketing2

businessofapps.com/marketplace/influencer-marketing/platforms2

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-influencer-marketing-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Collabstr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Collabstr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at collabstr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.