GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Sharebee · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Sharebee

17Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sharebee was named 6 times in Employee advocacy, where DSMN8 led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 63

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 64

under the label threshold

Enterprise16 of 55

under the label threshold

In employee advocacy · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sharebee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee advocacy platforms	Marketing	0%	21 of 64	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by DSMN8 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sharebee yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sharebee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the balance of usability, capabilities and pricing makes Sharebee our top pick in this category” Muse Glimmer 30B · Employee advocacy · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“ideal for LinkedIn-focused ambassador programs with strong gamification and analytics” Muse Glimmer 30B · Employee advocacy · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: straightforward, user-friendly advocacy programs.” GPT-5.4 mini · Employee advocacy · comparative prompt · alternative

“check Sharebee or Vista Social first” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee advocacy · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sharebee, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sharebee was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DSMN813 of 176Not among the top eight

Oktopost12 of 173Not among the top eight

EveryoneSocial11 of 174Not among the top eight

Hootsuite Amplify10 of 170Not among the top eight

GaggleAMP8 of 170Not among the top eight

Sociabble8 of 170Not among the top eight

Clearview Social5 of 172Not among the top eight

Taplio5 of 170Not among the top eight

PostBeyond4 of 170Not among the top eight

Supergrow4 of 170Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sharebee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Sharebee and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com16

blog.hootsuite.com14

guideflow.com13

supergrow.ai12

dsmn8.com10

g2.com9

heysid.com9

taplio.com9

referralrock.com8

worldmetrics.org8

108 of the 108 domain citations in answers naming Sharebee came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-employee-advocacy-software16

blog.hootsuite.com/employee-advocacy-tools13

guideflow.com/blog/best-employee-advocacy-software-tools12

supergrow.ai/blog/employee-advocacy-tools11

dsmn8.com/blog/how-to-choose-the-best-employee-advocacy-platform9

g2.com/categories/employee-advocacy9

heysid.com/resources/best-employee-advocacy-software-and-tools-for-b2b9

taplio.com/blog/employee-advocacy-tools9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Sharebee

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sharebee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sharebee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sharebee by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Sharebee is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sharebee, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.