AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Seismic Learning · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Seismic Learning

13Judge labels
2First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Seismic Learning was named 3 times in Sales coaching, where MindTickle led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sales coaching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Seismic Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales coaching and trainingSales0%95 of 12433%3under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Seismic Learning held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Sales coaching · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 36 → 16 of 123
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 82 → 91 of 118
Enterprise▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 9 of 80

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Sales coaching0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 82 → 95 of 124

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Seismic Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“mid-market buyers must watch out for "bundle creep" ... don't need Seismic’s massive (and expensive) enterprise content management ecosystem” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales coaching · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Seismic Learning, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Seismic Learning was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gong9 of 132Not among the top eight
MindTickle8 of 133Not among the top eight
Allego7 of 130Not among the top eight
SalesHood6 of 131Not among the top eight
Highspot6 of 130Not among the top eight
Showpad Coach6 of 130Not among the top eight
Chorus by ZoomInfo5 of 130Not among the top eight
Lessonly3 of 130Not among the top eight
Salesloft Conversations3 of 130Not among the top eight
Second Nature3 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Seismic Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Seismic Learning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cirrusinsight.com7
g2.com7
pipeline.zoominfo.com7
learn.g2.com6
mindtickle.com5
blog.hubspot.com4
cloudtalk.io4
dock.us4
exec.com4
pitchmonster.io4

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Seismic Learning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

seismic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Seismic Learning takes 0% of first choices and MindTickle takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sales coaching and training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales coaching and training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 35,447 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,051 · 395 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,312
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
52 ads · 52 text · 36 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2022, as Seismic Software, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 40 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 95 of 124 in sales coaching
Segment leader
24%
MindTickle
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on seismic.com
4,405
subdomains included
Content
1,385
counted in the table below
Documentation
87
Product · Integration
170 · 14
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog751undated
Report or ebook194undated
Glossary or explainer145undated
Case study132undated
News or press68undated
Webinar or virtual event3602026-02-20
Podcast or video35undated
Comparison16undated
Conference or event402026-03-02
Template or tool4undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page seismic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Seismic Learning

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Seismic Learning; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lessonly / Seismic Learning 2

Follow Seismic Learning

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Seismic Learning is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A powerful sales readiness solution that onboards, upskills, and improves performance with personalized, scalable learning.
Customers named
OneSource VirtualScorpionJostensFlock SafetyAlera GroupPleoIBMFreshworks
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Seismic Learning's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: seismic.com/platform/learning, seismic.com, trust.seismic.com, seismic.com/platform, seismic.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Seismic Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Seismic Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Seismic Learning by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Seismic Learning is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Seismic Learning, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at seismic.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.