Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 of 92, unchanged
SE Ranking · 1 category · Named, not rankedSE Visible
8Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SE Visible was named 5 times in AI visibility, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business35 of 94
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 90
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise53 of 79
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SE Visible for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 2% | 12 of 90 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SE Visible held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI visibility · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 14 of 85
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SE Visible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SE Visible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SE Visible (Best Overall for Mid-Size B2B)” Kimi K2 · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For SEO‑centric teams: HubSpot AEO, SE Visible, or Semrush AI Toolkit.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI visibility · comparative prompt · alternative
“SEO teams that want AI tracking alongside established SEO tools” GPT-6 Luna · AI visibility · comparative prompt · alternative
“AI mention tracking + full SEO reporting; competitor insights” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI visibility · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“*SE Visible* starts at a much higher monthly baseline, with several major models like Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini listed as "coming soon"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI visibility · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SE Visible, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SE Visible was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SE Visible, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SE Visible was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SE Visible. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named SE Visible and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
airops.com4
analyticsinsight.net3
blog.hubspot.com3
business.com3
semrush.com3
usa.inquirer.net3
writesonic.com3
frase.io2
geoptie.com2
nerdbot.com2
Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming SE Visible came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
seranking.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SE Visible takes 2% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
seranking.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, SE Visible takes 2% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
6
Position for “best ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Its company's site
- seranking.com shared with SE Ranking's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 309,691 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 24,424 · 2,362 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 17,717
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 67 clicks and $2,632 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 90 in AI visibility
Segment leader
20%
Otterly
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 8 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 8 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SE Visible
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SE Visible; a claim can dispute any of them.
SE Ranking / SE Visible 1SE Visible / SE Ranking 1
Follow SE Visible
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SE Ranking is the company behind SE Visible.ShowHide
The company
SE Ranking is the company behind SE Visible.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- seranking.com
- Headquarters
- United States
- Founded
- 2012
- Also from SE Ranking
- SE Ranking Core, SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- An AI Visibility Tool Made to Empower Brands
- For
- Business Owners; Agencies & Agency Owners; CMOs & Digital Marketers; PR & Brand Specialists; Product Marketing experts
- Price stated
- Complete AI visibility tool with pricing that works for you visible.seranking.com
- Starting price
- 99 visible.seranking.com
- Free plan or trial
- a 10-day free trial visible.seranking.com
- Hosting
- USUKCanadaFranceGermanythe NetherlandsSpain
- Customers named
- IndeedKick PointOraintiClickySixth City MarketingAboutHotelierSite Strategics
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications
What SE Visible's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: visible.seranking.com, seranking.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SE Visible's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SE Visible, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SE Visible by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SE Visible is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SE Visible, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.