GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit · September 2026 Edition

SE Ranking · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit was named 1 time in AI visibility, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market65 of 119

under the label threshold

Enterprise62 of 111

under the label threshold

In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools	Marketing	0%	65 of 119	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For integrated SEO + AI tracking: SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit analyzes answers generated by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Profound1 of 21Not in the top three

Siftly1 of 21Not in the top three

Ahrefs Brand Radar1 of 20Not in the top three

Evertune1 of 20Not in the top three

Otterly1 of 20Not in the top three

Peec AI1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amplitude.com2

brainlabsdigital.com2

builtin.com2

semrush.com2

seranking.comYour site2

visible.seranking.comYour site2

wpengine.com2

business.adobe.com1

dageno.ai1

impact.com1

Thirteen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplitude.com/compare/best-ai-visibility-monitoring-tools2

brainlabsdigital.com/the-10-best-tools-for-tracking-ai-visibility2

builtin.com/articles/ai-brand-visibility-tools2

semrush.com/free-tools/ai-search-visibility-checker2

seranking.com/ai-visibility-tracker.html2

visible.seranking.com/blog/best-ai-visibility-tools2

wpengine.com/blog/ai-visibility-tracking-tools2

business.adobe.com/blog/track-brand-mentions-in-ai-search1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

SE Ranking is the company behind SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit.

Website: seranking.com
Headquarters: United States
Founded: 2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SE Ranking's AI Search Toolkit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at seranking.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.