GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Responsive formerly RFPIO · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Responsive formerly RFPIO

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

1 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Responsive formerly RFPIO was named 1 time in RFP response, where Loopio led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market35 of 82

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 54

under the label threshold

In rfp response · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Responsive formerly RFPIO for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
RFP response software	Sales	0%	35 of 82	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Responsive formerly RFPIO yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Responsive formerly RFPIO across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for overall end-to-end RFP management and feature breadth.” Muse Glimmer 30B · RFP response · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Responsive formerly RFPIO, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Responsive formerly RFPIO was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Loopio4 of 40Not among the top eight

Upland Qvidian4 of 40Not among the top eight

AutoRFP.ai2 of 40Not among the top eight

QorusDocs2 of 40Not among the top eight

Conga Composer1 of 40Not among the top eight

Epicor CPQ1 of 40Not among the top eight

GetAccept1 of 40Not among the top eight

Inventive AI1 of 40Not among the top eight

PandaDoc1 of 40Not among the top eight

Proposify1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Responsive formerly RFPIO. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Responsive formerly RFPIO and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

inventive.ai4

loopio.com4

responsive.ioYour site4

learn.g2.com3

autogenai.com2

autorfp.ai2

bidsparq.com2

g2.com2

gartner.com2

gitnux.org2

Twenty-three of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Responsive formerly RFPIO came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

responsive.io/blog/best-rfp-software4

learn.g2.com/best-rfp-software3

loopio.com/blog/best-ai-software-rfp-responses3

bidsparq.com/blog/rfp-management-software2

g2.com/categories/rfp2

gartner.com/reviews/market/rfp-response-management-applications2

steerlab.ai/blog/7-best-rfp-software-in-20262

storyflow.so/blog/best-rfp-response-tools-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

responsive.io ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Responsive formerly RFPIO takes 0% of first choices and Loopio takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “rfp response software”

Position for “best rfp response software”

Organic visits to its site: about 37,620 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,554 · 527 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,111
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

57 ads · 26 text, 25 video, 6 image · 16 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2023, as RFPIO Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 36 in the year, 21 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 35 of 82 in RFP response

Segment leader

25%

Loopio

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on responsive.io

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-10 to 2026-09	Latest	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	37	3		2026-09-22

Most recent

2026-09-222426262 foundations of content management glossary or explainer
2026-08-193599068 coffee chat optimizing content health for the ai era 28th january 2026 glossary or explainer
2026-07-223531441 coffee chat optimizing content health for the ai era 28th january 2026 glossary or explainer
2026-05-203411982 coffee chat optimizing content health for the ai era 28th january 2026 glossary or explainer
2026-04-293347437 coffee chat optimizing content health for the ai era 28th january 2026 glossary or explainer
2026-03-253274659 coffee chat optimizing content health for the ai era 28th january 2026 glossary or explainer

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page responsive.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Responsive formerly RFPIO

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Responsive formerly RFPIO; a claim can dispute any of them.

Responsive, formerly RFPIO 1

Follow Responsive formerly RFPIO

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Responsive is the company behind Responsive formerly RFPIO.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: responsive.io
Founded: 2015

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Responsive formerly RFPIO's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Responsive formerly RFPIO, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Responsive formerly RFPIO by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Responsive formerly RFPIO is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Responsive formerly RFPIO, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.