GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Reditus · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Reditus

17Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reditus was named 6 times in Affiliate, where PartnerStack led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 109

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 69

under the label threshold

In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Reditus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	0%	22 of 87	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Reditus yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Reditus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options to consider are PartnerStack and Reditus, which are both B2B-focused and have high G2 ratings.” Llama 4 Maverick · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“a highly attractive option if you want a dedicated B2B affiliate recruitment network” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“3. Reditus (Best with built-in affiliate network)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“The Best Value/B2B-Specific Alternative: Reditus” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Reditus, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reditus was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PartnerStack17 of 178Not in the top three

Rewardful10 of 173Not in the top three

impact.com8 of 171Not in the top three

FirstPromoter7 of 171Not in the top three

Kiflo3 of 170Not in the top three

Tapfiliate3 of 170Not in the top three

PartnerPortal.io2 of 171Not in the top three

Trackdesk2 of 171Not in the top three

Awin2 of 170Not in the top three

CJ Affiliate2 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reditus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 17 answers that named Reditus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tapfiliate.com5

getreditus.com4

modash.io4

linkjolt.io3

partnero.com3

referralcandy.com3

g2.com2

influencermarketinghub.com2

introw.io2

learn.g2.com2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Reditus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getreditus.com/blog/top-affiliate-marketing-tools3

modash.io/blog/affiliate-management-software-tools3

partnero.com/articles/best-affiliate-management-tools3

referralcandy.com/blog/best-affiliate-program-software-in-2026-ranked-by-features-pricing-3

tapfiliate.com/blog/best-affiliate-management-software3

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-software-platforms2

introw.io/blog/best-affiliate-management-software2

learn.g2.com/best-affiliate-marketing-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reditus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reditus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at reditus.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.