Every category where a model named Trackdesk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	4%	5 of 87	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trackdesk yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trackdesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained10 labels2

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the recommended affiliate program management tool for a mid-sized B2B company is Trackdesk, as it is considered the best mid-market balance” Llama 4 Maverick · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you have virtually no budget to start, GoAffPro or Trackdesk are excellent choices.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose Trackdesk if you care most about mid-market value, simplicity, and transparent pricing” Perplexity Sonar · Affiliate · direct prompt · alternative

“Scaling programs, automation| $249–$299 | 4.8 | Unlimited everything, anti-fraud” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trackdesk, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trackdesk was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PartnerStack11 of 213Not in the top three

impact.com10 of 211Not in the top three

Refersion9 of 210Not in the top three

Post Affiliate Pro8 of 212Not in the top three

Tapfiliate8 of 211Not in the top three

FirstPromoter8 of 210Not in the top three

Rewardful8 of 210Not in the top three

GoAffPro7 of 215Not in the top three

UpPromote5 of 211Not in the top three

Awin4 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trackdesk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 21 answers that named Trackdesk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

influencermarketinghub.com3

linkjolt.io3

modash.io3

tapfiliate.com3

g2.com2

learn.g2.com2

mailmodo.com2

referralcandy.com2

adamconnell.me1

admitad.com1

Twenty-two of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Trackdesk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

linkjolt.io/blog/best-affiliate-marketing-platforms3

tapfiliate.com/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms-for-growing-brands-cck3

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-software-platforms2

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-websites2

learn.g2.com/best-affiliate-marketing-software2

mailmodo.com/guides/affiliate-marketing-platforms2

modash.io/blog/affiliate-management-software-tools2

modash.io/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trackdesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trackdesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trackdesk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.