Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 11 of 56
2 categories · RankedTrackdesk
33Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Affiliate for small business buyers
Rank 19 of 94 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 57
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market19 of 94
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise4 of 48
8%9 labels
under the label threshold
In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Trackdesk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliate and partner management | Partner and channel | 0% | 19 of 94 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 49% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 66 of 112 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Trackdesk held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Affiliate · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 19 of 90
Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 7 → 4 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliate | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 → 19 of 94 |
| Referrals | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 66 of 112, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Trackdesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Trackdesk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative7 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels4
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want the best value: Go with Trackdesk — it offers enterprise-grade features at SMB pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Affiliate · direct prompt · alternative
“Trackdesk is the best mid-market balance of rating, capability, and operational simplicity.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Broad tracking platform aimed at scaling multi-program partner operations.” Perplexity Sonar · Referrals · comparative prompt · alternative
“UpPromote, Trackdesk, Affiliatly, or Rewardful are common choices” Perplexity Sonar · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trackdesk, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trackdesk was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Trackdesk, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trackdesk was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trackdesk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 33 answers that named Trackdesk and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
modash.io29
learn.g2.com27
tapfiliate.com23
postaffiliatepro.com18
influencermarketinghub.com15
shopify.com15
resources.rework.com13
guideflow.com11
g2.com10
bitly.com7
168 of the 168 domain citations in answers naming Trackdesk came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
trackdesk.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trackdesk takes 0% of first choices and PartnerStack takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
trackdesk.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trackdesk takes 0% of first choices and PartnerStack takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “affiliate marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best affiliate marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“trackdesk”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,897 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 478 · 70 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,076
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 94 in affiliate
Segment leader
49%
PartnerStack
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 33 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on trackdesk.com
532
subdomains included
Content
142
counted in the table below
Documentation
247
Product · Integration
77 · 9
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 96 | 2 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Comparison | 39 | 8 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-16Casino affiliate program case study case study
- 2026-09-1010163025 smart links glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-10Trackdesk vs cake comparison comparison
- 2026-09-09Affiliate vs paid ads online casinos comparison
- 2026-09-09Trackdesk vs tune comparison comparison
- 2026-09-05Affise vs tune vs cake comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page trackdesk.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Trackdesk
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Trackdesk is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Trackdesk is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Best Affiliate Tracking Software
- For
- affiliate, referral and partnerships programs
- Price stated
- For Affiliate Programs: Business – $299/mo; Enterprise – from $599/mo; Enterprise PLUS – from $1,199/mo. For Agencies and Affiliate Networks: Seed Network – from $449/mo; Growth Network – $999/mo; Network PLUS – from $1,499/mo. For iGaming: Slot – from $1,499/mo; Jackpot – $1,999/mo; Full House – Custom trackdesk.com
- Starting price
- 299 trackdesk.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial trackdesk.com
- Integrations claimed
- 900 trackdesk.com
- Certifications
- ISO:27001 CertifiedCertified ISO 27001:2022Google Certified Click Tracker
- Hosting
- EU-basedEU data residencyUS privacy
- Customers named
- Top One FuturesAdbirdFinNetNexgen ProTrader FundingiGaming OperatorDigital Ascension GroupHello ProjectFoodience
What Trackdesk's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trackdesk.com, trackdesk.com/pricing, trackdesk.com/features/2fa, trackdesk.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trackdesk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trackdesk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trackdesk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Trackdesk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trackdesk, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.