Every category where a model named Post Affiliate Pro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	2%	9 of 87	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%
Referral and partner programs	Partner and channel	0%	42 of 107	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Post Affiliate Pro yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Post Affiliate Pro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labels3

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Post Affiliate Pro as the top affiliate program management tool” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Refersion, and Post Affiliate Pro — especially for their fraud prevention and transparent operations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Referrals · negative prompt · alternative

“Tier 1 Solution (like Impact, PartnerStack, Refersion, or Post Affiliate Pro)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Affiliate · scale prompt · alternative

“More feature-rich, but can still be cost-effective if you need customization” GPT-5.4 mini · Affiliate · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Post Affiliate Pro, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Post Affiliate Pro was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PartnerStack27 of 398Not in the top three

Tapfiliate26 of 399Not in the top three

impact.com25 of 394Not in the top three

Rewardful19 of 393Not in the top three

Refersion19 of 390Not in the top three

FirstPromoter13 of 390Not in the top three

Everflow11 of 391Not in the top three

LeadDyno10 of 390Not in the top three

Trackdesk8 of 392Not in the top three

LinkJolt6 of 394Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Post Affiliate Pro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 39 answers that named Post Affiliate Pro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

linkjolt.io5

tapfiliate.com5

influencermarketinghub.com4

mailmodo.com4

modash.io4

postaffiliatepro.comYour site4

referralcandy.com4

g2.com3

learn.g2.com3

bitly.com2

Thirty-four of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Post Affiliate Pro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

linkjolt.io/blog/best-affiliate-marketing-platforms5

tapfiliate.com/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms-for-growing-brands-cck5

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-websites4

mailmodo.com/guides/affiliate-marketing-platforms4

modash.io/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms4

referralcandy.com/blog/best-affiliate-program-software-in-2026-ranked-by-features-pricing-4

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-software-platforms3

learn.g2.com/best-affiliate-marketing-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Post Affiliate Pro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Post Affiliate Pro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at postaffiliatepro.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.