Every category where a model named ClickBank for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	0%	23 of 87	23%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ClickBank yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ClickBank across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Amazon Associates, ClickBank – Beginner-friendly with proven track records.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · negative prompt · alternative

“Has an open marketplace; almost anyone can sell here with instant approval” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative

“Digital products / info products / courses? → ClickBank” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative

“For digital products: ClickBank or Digistore24” MiniMax M2.5 · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The marketplace contains many low-quality, "salesy" products. If you are a high-end brand, promoting here can risk brand dilution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · comparative prompt · soft negative

“ClickBank (High Selectivity Required) ... The "Dormant Fee" Trap” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · negative prompt · soft negative

“ClickBank (with research)” MiniMax M2.5 · Affiliate · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ClickBank, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ClickBank was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

impact.com19 of 264Not in the top three

ShareASale18 of 262Not in the top three

Amazon Associates17 of 261Not in the top three

Awin17 of 261Not in the top three

PartnerStack16 of 263Not in the top three

CJ Affiliate16 of 260Not in the top three

Rakuten Advertising12 of 260Not in the top three

FlexOffers7 of 261Not in the top three

Digistore247 of 260Not in the top three

Rewardful7 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ClickBank. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 26 answers that named ClickBank and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

joinbrands.com3

adpushup.com2

dev.to2

digistore24.com2

hostinger.com2

popularpays.com2

reddit.com2

tapfiliate.com2

admitad.com1

affiliateeducationforbeginners.com1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming ClickBank came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

joinbrands.com/blog/best-affiliate-marketing-platforms3

adpushup.com/blog/high-ticket-affiliate-marketing2

dev.to/sushant_raj_420bacbb30d0c/top-5-affiliate-marketing-platforms-2025-2bkg2

digistore24.com/en/blog/avoid-affiliate-scams2

hostinger.com/tutorials/affiliate-marketing-scams2

tapfiliate.com/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms-for-growing-brands-cck2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

ClickBank.

Website: clickbank.com
Headquarters: United States, United States
Founded: 1998

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ClickBank's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ClickBank, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clickbank.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.