GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Awin · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Awin

51Judge labels
0First choices
12Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Affiliate for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 20 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Awin for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Affiliate and partner managementPartner and channel0%18 of 8710%20accepted challenger
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel0%71 of 1070%1under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Awin yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Awin across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00112
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative21 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative15 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“An SMB Retailer on a Budget | Awin | Offers low setup fees, transparent pricing, and instant global publisher reach.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative
“ShareASale & Awin (Great for e-commerce, physical products, and mid-sized brands).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · negative prompt · alternative
“ShareASale, Rakuten, Awin – Transparent, reliable payments, good support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · negative prompt · alternative
“Focuses heavily on international reach and global coverage” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid joining massive networks like Awin, CJ Affiliate, or Impact.com early on” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd be especially careful with platforms that already have visible complaint volume on BBB, such as Mavely, AWIN, and The Super Affiliate Network.” GPT-5.4 mini · Affiliate · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Awin, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Awin was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
impact.com43 of 5116Not in the top three
PartnerStack34 of 517Not in the top three
CJ Affiliate34 of 512Not in the top three
ShareASale29 of 512Not in the top three
Rakuten Advertising24 of 510Not in the top three
Amazon Associates18 of 514Not in the top three
ClickBank17 of 510Not in the top three
Tapfiliate14 of 513Not in the top three
Refersion14 of 512Not in the top three
Partnerize13 of 513Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Awin. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 51 answers that named Awin and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

influencermarketinghub.com5
modash.io5
linkjolt.io4
tapfiliate.com4
gartner.com3
levanta.io3
linkedin.com3
mailmodo.com3
optimisemedia.com3
reddit.com3

Thirty-six of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Awin came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Awin

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Awin; a claim can dispute any of them.
AWIN 1Awin & ShareASale 1Awin (formerly ShareASale) 1

The company

Awin.
Website
awin.com
Headquarters
Berlin, Germany
Founded
2000

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Awin's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Awin, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at awin.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.