PartnerStack vs Awin
Fourteen of fourteen models named PartnerStack first on the direct prompt; zero named Awin. Both were named by all fourteen models and PartnerStack carries 50 labels and Awin 32, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Berlin, Germany, founded 2000. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the affiliate and partner management page.
By framing
PartnerStackFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAwin
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, PartnerStack and Awin were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 419 answers naming PartnerStack and the 81 naming Awin. In those answers Awin took the first choice three times and PartnerStack twelve.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
PartnerStack Awin first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PartnerStack on the left and Awin on the right.The direct prompt
PartnerStack first, Awin not the choice
14 of 14 modelsAwin was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PartnerStack25%#1 of 16Awin0%#13 of 16PartnerStack49%#1 of 12Awin2%#6 of 12PartnerStack34%#2 of 11Awin0%#8 of 11What the models said about PartnerStack
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, PartnerStack offers the best balance of features, pricing, and B2B-specific functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Impact or PartnerStack – Both offer enterprise features, dedicated support, and handle complex commission structures” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose a SaaS (Impact/PartnerStack) if you are a B2B company...It is generally cheaper and easier to set up than Impact.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Awin
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“you should avoid traditional "Affiliate Networks" (like Awin/ShareASale, CJ Affiliate, or Impact.com)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget | ShareASale/Awin | ~$625–$750 one-time setup fee” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Awin | Mixed reviews with billing and support problems” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“the best starting option is usually Awin Access / Awin if you want a low-cost affiliate network” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Starting a content site or blog: Try Awin or CJ for multiple brands” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · first choice
“look at CJ, Awin, or Impact” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.