PartnerStack vs Amazon Associates
Fourteen of fourteen models named PartnerStack first on the direct prompt; zero named Amazon Associates. PartnerStack was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Amazon Associates by thirteen and PartnerStack carries 50 labels and Amazon Associates 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
By Amazon, Seattle, United States, founded 1994. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the affiliate and partner management page.
By framing
PartnerStackFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAmazon Associates
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
PartnerStack Amazon Associates first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PartnerStack on the left and Amazon Associates on the right.The direct prompt
PartnerStack first, Amazon Associates not the choice
14 of 14 modelsAmazon Associates was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PartnerStack25%#1 of 16Amazon Associates4%#7 of 16PartnerStack49%#1 of 12Amazon Associates4%#3 of 12PartnerStack34%#2 of 11Amazon Associates0%#– of 11What the models said about PartnerStack
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, PartnerStack offers the best balance of features, pricing, and B2B-specific functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Impact or PartnerStack – Both offer enterprise features, dedicated support, and handle complex commission structures” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose a SaaS (Impact/PartnerStack) if you are a B2B company...It is generally cheaper and easier to set up than Impact.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Amazon Associates
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Amazon Associates frequently changes its terms, sometimes resulting in commission reductions across product ranges, though it's still widely used.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Widely used as an entry point but repeatedly criticized for low pay and unstable terms.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Amazon Associates: A popular choice for beginners, with easy setup and high conversion rates.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“The search results consistently recommend established networks like: - Amazon Associates” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“starting with Amazon Associates makes sense for the lowest barrier to entry” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.