Every category where a model named Tapfiliate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	11%	3 of 87	5%	22	accepted challenger
Referral and partner programs	Partner and channel	0%	36 of 107	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	34 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Loyalty, advocacy and referrals	Marketing	0%	56 of 124	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tapfiliate yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tapfiliate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	2	2	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	0	2
Kimi K2	2	2	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels3

Paraphrase21 labels8

Comparative18 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained29 labels7

Scale-constrained9 labels3

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative92 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are strictly focused on affiliate marketing and want a simpler, cost-effective setup, go with Tapfiliate.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Start with a free trial of ReferralCandy or Tapfiliate. Both offer robust features at accessible prices” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice

“A strong all-around choice for small businesses... General small business/ecommerce: Tapfiliate” GPT-5.4 mini · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: Tapfiliate (Best All-Around for Mid-Sized B2B)” Kimi K2 · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Simpler, cheaper, but may lack enterprise depth” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Affiliate · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tapfiliate, over the 92 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tapfiliate was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PartnerStack56 of 9211Compare →

impact.com47 of 926Compare →

Rewardful44 of 925Not in the top three

Refersion35 of 923Not in the top three

FirstPromoter32 of 921Not in the top three

Post Affiliate Pro26 of 924Not in the top three

LeadDyno24 of 921Not in the top three

ShareASale17 of 921Not in the top three

Awin14 of 922Not in the top three

ReferralCandy12 of 923Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tapfiliate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 92 answers that named Tapfiliate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

tapfiliate.comYour site9

referralcandy.com8

influencermarketinghub.com7

linkjolt.io6

mailmodo.com6

modash.io6

learn.g2.com5

referral-factory.com4

shopify.com4

gartner.com3

Forty-nine of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Tapfiliate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

referralcandy.com/blog/best-affiliate-program-software-in-2026-ranked-by-features-pricing-7

linkjolt.io/blog/best-affiliate-marketing-platforms6

mailmodo.com/guides/affiliate-marketing-platforms6

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-software-platforms5

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-websites5

learn.g2.com/best-affiliate-marketing-software5

modash.io/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms5

tapfiliate.com/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms-for-growing-brands-cck5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tapfiliate

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tapfiliate; a claim can dispute any of them.

Refersion / Tapfiliate 1Tapfiliate / Refersion 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tapfiliate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tapfiliate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tapfiliate.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.