Every category where a model named Red Points for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Brand protection platforms	Marketing	40%	1 of 84	18%	61	endorsed leader

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Red Points yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Red Points across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	3	0	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	2	5
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	1	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	1	2	6
Mistral Small	2	0	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	0	1	2	6
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	3	0	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	0	3
Kimi K2	4	0	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	3	1	0	1	5
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	1	0	4
GPT-6 Luna	2	1	0	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	1	2	6

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct37 labels17

Paraphrase36 labels27

Comparative39 labels24not counted in share

Budget-constrained33 labels17

Scale-constrained16 labels4

Negative27 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative188 labels in all, every segment counted; 65 of the 91 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excels in high-volume counterfeit detection and takedowns on e-commerce marketplaces... Best for enterprises needing broad channel coverage and cost-predictable takedowns.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Brand protection · comparative prompt · first choice

“Red Points: Ideal for mid-market brands, especially e-commerce, offering automated enforcement and high-volume takedowns with minimal manual effort.” Mistral Small · Brand protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Red Points - This platform is mentioned multiple times in your search results. It's described as a fully managed, AI-led brand protection platform” MiniMax M2.5 · Brand protection · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd start with Red Points because it appears especially well-suited to teams that need counterfeit removal, impersonation takedowns” GPT-5.4 mini · Brand protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Don't pay for enterprise platforms (Red Points, BrandShield, ZeroFox) — those start at ~$5,000/month and are overkill.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Brand protection · budget prompt · hard negative

“their system is lazy and poorly built. It often sends DMCA takedown notices for URLs that have nothing to do with” Muse Glimmer 30B · Brand protection · negative prompt · hard negative

“rated strongest for scale but "its custom pricing and advanced features may not be suitable for small businesses with limited budgets."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Brand protection · budget prompt · soft negative

“Avoid enterprise platforms (Red Points, MarqVision, BrandShield, Netcraft, etc.) unless you have a significant budget” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Brand protection · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Red Points, over the 188 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Red Points was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BrandShield144 of 18814Compare →

Corsearch97 of 1886Not among the top eight

ZeroFox75 of 1883Compare →

MarqVision69 of 1885Compare →

Netcraft45 of 1884Not among the top eight

Bolster43 of 1882Compare →

MarkMonitor41 of 1882Not among the top eight

IP Moat20 of 18810Not among the top eight

CSC16 of 1880Not among the top eight

OpSec16 of 1880Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Red Points. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 182 of the 188 answers that named Red Points and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

redpoints.comYour site159

g2.com85

spotsaas.com82

thecmo.com77

expertinsights.com75

brandshield.com72

guideflow.com65

marqvision.com61

gartner.com60

quasa.io58

635 of the 794 domain citations in answers naming Red Points came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

redpoints.com/blog/best-brand-protection-software137

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-brand-protection-solutions75

thecmo.com/tools/best-brand-protection-software66

guideflow.com/blog/brand-protection-software64

quasa.io/insights/7-best-brand-protection-platforms-in-2026-ranked-reviewed58

gartner.com/reviews/market/brand-protection-software56

spotsaas.com/category/brand-protection-software41

g2.com/categories/brand-protection/small-business40

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Red Points stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “brand protection platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best brand protection platform”

Searches for its name, Google: 14,800 a month (“red points”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3,227 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 9,588 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,878 · 50 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,453
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 92 text, 18 image, 10 video · 118 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2022, as RED POINTS SOLUTIONS S.L., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 34 in the year, 86 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

40%

rank 1 of 84 in brand protection

First choices

across its categories

Named in: 188 answers
Its own site cited: in 182 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on redpoints.com

982

subdomains included

Content

576

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	348	27	2026-09-28	SEO
News or press	113	0	2026-02-10
Case study	43	0	2026-03-26
Webinar or virtual event	26	undated
Podcast or video	17	undated
Comparison	15	3	2026-10-02
Report or ebook	8	0	2026-05-19
Glossary or explainer	6	3	2026-08-04

Most recent

2026-10-02Red points vs corsearch comparison
2026-09-28How to stop software piracy blog
2026-09-28Brand protection technology blog
2026-09-21Manufacturing in china blog
2026-09-17Prevent password sharing blog
2026-09-17Alibaba ip protection blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page redpoints.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Red Points

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Red Points; a claim can dispute any of them.

Red Points Enterprise 1

Follow Red Points

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Red Points is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI Brand Protection Platform
redpoints.com
For: brands of all sizes
redpoints.com
Price stated: Red Points uses a flat-fee pricing model based on the scope of your brand protection program. Within that agreed scope, detections and takedowns are unlimited. You are not charged per detection. You are not charged per takedown. redpoints.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Get 1 month free. Deal ends in: 10d 9h 35m 5s redpoints.com
Integrations claimed: 50 redpoints.com/pricing
Certifications: Google's Trusted Copyright Removal Program MemberYoutube-Certified Multi-Channel NetworkGoogle's Trusted ReporterYoutube-Certified Multi- Channel Network
Hosting: North AmericaMainland ChinaEMEAAPACLATAM
Customers named: EssityHerbalifeKeenPurpleCotopaxiBurtonTopconFILA Italy
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price

What Red Points's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: redpoints.com, redpoints.com/pricing, redpoints.com/software/platform-pulse-newsletter, redpoints.com/blog/category/customer-stories, redpoints.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Red Points's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Red Points, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Red Points by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Red Points is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Red Points, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Red Points is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

AI models recommend Red Points first in Brand protection platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/brand-protection/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/red-points--brand-protection-wide.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Brand protection platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Brand protection platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/brand-protection/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/red-points--brand-protection-square.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Brand protection platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Brand protection platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/brand-protection/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/red-points--brand-protection-compact.svg" alt="AI models' first choice in Brand protection platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Brand protection platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.