| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand protection platforms | Marketing | 17% | 2 of 84 | 21% | 52 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I would recommend BrandShield as a tool to take down counterfeits and brand impersonation for a mid-sized B2B company.” Llama 4 Maverick · Brand protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the strongest default choice is usually BrandShield or Red Points, with BrandShield often the better fit” Perplexity Sonar · Brand protection · direct prompt · first choice
“#1 Leader on G2 Grid® (Fall 2025), excels in mid-market quadrant for usability, implementation, and relationships.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Brand protection · direct prompt · first choice
“Best All-Around for B2B Impersonation & Phishing: BrandShield ... is the top recommendation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Brand protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“This is the platform with the most sustained public criticism in the recent set of reviews.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Brand protection · negative prompt · hard negative
“Don't pay for enterprise platforms (Red Points, BrandShield, ZeroFox)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Brand protection · budget prompt · hard negative
“requires sales engagement; less transparent” Kimi K2 · Brand protection · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“rated strongest for scale but "its custom pricing and advanced features may not be suitable for small businesses with limited budgets."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Brand protection · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 150 of the 156 answers that named BrandShield and are not a share of its labels.
626 of the 698 domain citations in answers naming BrandShield came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 343 | 18 | 2026-09-29 | Mobile apps, Ecommerce | |
| News or press | 99 | 2 | 2026-09-30 | ||
| Case study | 12 | 5 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 11 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 3 | 2026-07-17 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | 5 | 2026-08-30 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-09-16 |
Every page brandshield.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What BrandShield's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: brandshield.com, brandshield.com/who-we-serve/roles/security, brandshield.com/products, brandshield.com/company/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BrandShield's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BrandShield, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BrandShield by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
BrandShield is among the products AI models recommend first in Brand protection platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.