1 category · RankedCorsearch
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand protection platforms | Marketing | 0% | 19 of 84 | 37% | 30 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Corsearch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Corsearch combines trademark watch, domain management and online brand protection, with AI detection backed by enforcement analysts.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Brand protection · comparative prompt · first choice
“For marketplace counterfeits, compare Red Points, MarqVision, and Corsearch.” GPT-6 Luna · Brand protection · comparative prompt · first choice
“Leader in trademark monitoring, clearance, and enforcement... Suited for brands prioritizing legal-grade trademark protection” Grok 4.1 Fast · Brand protection · comparative prompt · alternative
“Corsearch is another good option because it is positioned to detect and remove counterfeit goods across online channels” Perplexity Sonar · Brand protection · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms with Significant Red Flags ... Corsearch ⚠️ - Very low Trustpilot rating (1.2/5)” Kimi K2 · Brand protection · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid ... Corsearch ... Why to avoid: High rate of false-positive takedowns” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Brand protection · negative prompt · hard negative
“allege bulk or inaccurate takedown practices and poor dispute responsiveness” Muse Glimmer 30B · Brand protection · negative prompt · hard negative
“Built for large trademark portfolios; no published pricing, likely $60K+” Kimi K2 · Brand protection · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Corsearch, over the 106 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Corsearch was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 100 of the 106 answers that named Corsearch and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
472 of the 472 domain citations in answers naming Corsearch came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
corsearch.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Corsearch takes 0% of first choices and Red Points takes 40%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“corsearch”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 38 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 37,723 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,715 · 201 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,679
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 7 across its categories
- Named in
- 106 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 100 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 365 | undated | Ecommerce | ||
| Conference or event | 106 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 86 | undated | Ecommerce | ||
| Report or ebook | 43 | undated | |||
| Case study | 37 | undated | |||
| News or press | 31 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
Events in person
- October 7, 2026 to October 10, 2026PTMG Autumn Conference 2026Prague · attends
- March 4, 2026 to March 5, 2026Corsearch at WTR’s Brand Strategy Summit Europe 202630 Euston Square, London · spoke
As the event pages on corsearch.com state them, read October 5, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page corsearch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Corsearch
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Corsearch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Corsearch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Corsearch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Corsearch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Corsearch, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.