Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 52 → 43 of 63
2 categories · Named, not rankedPipedream
14Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Pipedream was named 6 times in Automation & iPaaS and 1 other category, where Workato led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 68
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 67
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pipedream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow automation and iPaaS | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 22 of 67 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Workato at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 30 of 83 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 40% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pipedream held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Automation & iPaaS · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 34 of 63
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automation & iPaaS | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 22 of 67 |
| Warehouse & ETL | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 30 of 83, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pipedream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pipedream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For smaller teams or tighter budgets, Grouparoo (self-hosted) or Pipedream can be cost-effective alternatives.” Mistral Small · Warehouse & ETL · direct prompt · alternative
“Look at n8n or Pipedream when code, custom APIs, or deployment control matters.” GPT-6 Luna · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative
“For a budget option, consider RudderStack or Pipedream” Mistral Small · Warehouse & ETL · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pipedream, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pipedream was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pipedream, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pipedream was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pipedream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 14 answers that named Pipedream and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com5
zite.com5
viasocket.com4
automationatlas.io3
guideflow.com3
intuz.com3
resources.rework.com3
stepper.io3
wrike.com3
astera.com2
Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Pipedream came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pipedream.com
24,919
subdomains included
Content
242
counted in the table below
Documentation
222
Product · Integration
0 · 24,416
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 82 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 64 | undated | |||
| News or press | 32 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 22 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 19 | undated | |||
| Blog | 13 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pipedream.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Pipedream
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pipedream is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pipedream is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The integration layer for AI agents
- For
- For developers adding connectors to their agents and apps; For companies deploying AI securely across their organization
- Price stated
- Free to build. Pay when your integrations go to production. pipedream.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 pipedream.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Full access in development — no credit card, no paid plan until you move to production. pipedream.com
- Integrations claimed
- 10000 pipedream.com · 3000 pipedream.com/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2 and GDPRHIPAA
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting, customers
What Pipedream's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: pipedream.com, pipedream.com/pricing, pipedream.com/apps/trust. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pipedream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pipedream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pipedream by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pipedream is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pipedream, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.