GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Pipedream · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Pipedream

19Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Pipedream was named 8 times in Automation & iPaaS, where Workato led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business52 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market14 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprise82 of 116

under the label threshold

In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Pipedream for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	14 of 76	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Workato at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pipedream yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pipedream across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Developer-friendly | n8n or Pipedream | Code-native, version control” Kimi K2 · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose Pipedream if you're comfortable with code and APIs.” GPT-5.4 mini · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative

“Pipedream \u2014 Developer-First API Automation” Kimi K2 · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative

“The best developer-centric tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Automation & iPaaS · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Silent failures post-quota—accepts webhooks with "success" but drops events entirely” Grok 4.1 Fast · Automation & iPaaS · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pipedream, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pipedream was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Make19 of 194Not in the top three

Zapier19 of 193Not in the top three

n8n18 of 191Not in the top three

Workato12 of 192Not in the top three

Microsoft Power Automate12 of 190Not in the top three

Boomi9 of 190Not in the top three

MuleSoft8 of 190Not in the top three

Tray.ai8 of 190Not in the top three

Activepieces6 of 190Not in the top three

Integrately5 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pipedream. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 19 answers that named Pipedream and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

docs.workato.com1

help.zapier.com1

pipedream.comYour site1

Two of the three domain citations in answers naming Pipedream came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

docs.workato.com/getting-started/what-is-workato1

help.zapier.com/hc/en-us/articles/37518970271245-What-is-Zapier1

pipedream.com/docs/workflows1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pipedream's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pipedream, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pipedream.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.