GTM AI Index

Index › Products › PickFu · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

PickFu

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PickFu was named 2 times in Audience insights, where SparkToro led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business29 of 167

under the label threshold

Mid-market48 of 155

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In audience insights · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PickFu for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Audience and consumer insights platforms	Marketing	0%	48 of 155	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PickFu yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PickFu across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“PickFu is also flagged for mid-market marketing teams whose primary need is validating creative decisions quickly” Muse Glimmer 30B · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Budget options for SMBs needing fast polls/surveys, though less specialized for B2B depth.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PickFu, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PickFu was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GWI8 of 102Not among the top eight

Attest6 of 101Not among the top eight

SparkToro5 of 104Not among the top eight

SurveyMonkey5 of 104Not among the top eight

Audiense4 of 101Not among the top eight

Qualtrics4 of 100Not among the top eight

Hotjar3 of 101Not among the top eight

Mixpanel3 of 100Not among the top eight

Typeform3 of 100Not among the top eight

Pollfish2 of 101Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PickFu. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named PickFu and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com7

meltwater.com7

guideflow.com6

fluidsurveys.com5

learn.g2.com5

pickfu.comYour site5

articos.com4

gwi.com4

influencermarketinghub.com4

quo.com4

Forty-six of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming PickFu came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/consumer-insights-platforms/small-business6

meltwater.com/en/blog/top-consumer-insights-tools-companies6

fluidsurveys.com/best-market-research-software5

learn.g2.com/best-audience-intelligence-platforms5

pickfu.com/blog/audience-research-tools5

guideflow.com/blog/best-audience-intelligence-platforms4

guideflow.com/blog/consumer-insights-platforms4

gwi.com/blog/audience-research-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow PickFu

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PickFu's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PickFu, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PickFu by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where PickFu is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name PickFu, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.