Every category where a model named Optifai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	2%	14 of 75	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Optifai yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Optifai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained9 labels3

Scale-constrained3 labels2

Negative4 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend trying Optifai or Grain - both offer strong core features at accessible price points” MiniMax M2.5 · Revenue intel · budget prompt · first choice

“Best for AI-Native Capabilities on a Budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · budget prompt · alternative

“Optifai - Balanced Features at Low Cost” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue intel · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Optifai, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optifai was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Grain19 of 222Not in the top three

Clari Copilot19 of 220Not in the top three

Gong18 of 220Not in the top three

tl;dv18 of 220Not in the top three

Avoma16 of 228Not in the top three

Claap14 of 220Not in the top three

Revenue Grid10 of 220Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub8 of 222Not in the top three

Oliv6 of 220Not in the top three

Forecastio5 of 221Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Optifai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 22 answers that named Optifai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avoma.com1

caugia.com1

claap.io1

cleverly.co1

croclub.com1

demandbase.com1

gartner.com1

getmaxiq.com1

guideflow.com1

linkedin.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Optifai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

avoma.com/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-software1

caugia.com/intelligence/best-revenue-intelligence-platform.html1

claap.io/blog/revenue-intelligence-software1

cleverly.co/blog/revenue-intelligence-tools1

croclub.com/tools/best-revenue-intelligence-platform1

demandbase.com/blog/revenue-intelligence-platforms1

gartner.com/reviews/market/revenue-intelligence1

getmaxiq.com/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Optifai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Optifai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at optif.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.