AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Northern Light SinglePoint · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Northern Light SinglePoint

17Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Market intelligence for enterprise buyers
Rank 36 of 172 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In market intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Northern Light SinglePoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%36 of 1720%5under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Northern Light SinglePoint yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Northern Light SinglePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative11 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“an enterprise intelligence hub such as Northern Light” GPT-6 Luna · Market intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Northern Light SinglePoint, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Northern Light SinglePoint was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Klue15 of 171Not among the top eight
AlphaSense14 of 178Not among the top eight
Crayon12 of 170Not among the top eight
Contify9 of 170Not among the top eight
Valona Intelligence9 of 170Not among the top eight
ZoomInfo9 of 170Not among the top eight
6sense8 of 170Not among the top eight
Meltwater7 of 170Not among the top eight
Demandbase6 of 170Not among the top eight
Similarweb6 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Northern Light SinglePoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Northern Light SinglePoint and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

northernlight.comYour site15
pipeline.zoominfo.com11
alpha-sense.com10
demandbase.com10
contify.com8
quid.com8
meltwater.com6
gartner.com5
improvado.io5
valonaintelligence.com5

Sixty-eight of the eighty-three domain citations in answers naming Northern Light SinglePoint came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

northernlight.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Northern Light SinglePoint takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 17%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “market intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best market intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
30 a month (“northern light singlepoint”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 202 a month
Searches its site ranks for
82 · 7 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,015
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
6 ads · 5 text, 1 image · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2025, as NORTHERN LIGHT SINGLEPOINT, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 36 of 172 in market intelligence
Segment leader
17%
Apollo.io
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
in 17 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on northernlight.com
409
subdomains included
Content
366
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog323372026-10-01Market intelligence, Competitive intel
Webinar or virtual event1422026-10-01Market intelligence
Glossary or explainer842026-08-26
Conference or event702026-05-14
Case study4undated
Report or ebook412026-10-01
Comparison422026-08-26
Podcast or video102025-12-09
News or press102025-12-09
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page northernlight.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Northern Light SinglePoint

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Northern Light SinglePoint; a claim can dispute any of them.
Northern Light 4

Follow Northern Light SinglePoint

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Northern Light SinglePoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Northern Light SinglePoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Northern Light SinglePoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Northern Light SinglePoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Northern Light SinglePoint, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at northernlight.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.