GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Valona Intelligence · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Valona Intelligence

14Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

10 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Valona Intelligence was named 5 times in Market intelligence and 1 other category, where Apollo.io led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market39 of 172

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 105

under the label threshold

In market intelligence · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Valona Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Market intelligence platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	39 of 172	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%
Competitive intelligence tools	Marketing	0%	76 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Valona Intelligence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Valona Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Contify/Market Logic/Stravito/Valona if you want a broader enterprise intelligence layer” GPT-5.4 mini · Market intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Valona Intelligence, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Valona Intelligence was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Klue14 of 143Not among the top eight

Crayon13 of 142Not among the top eight

AlphaSense12 of 145Not among the top eight

Contify10 of 140Not among the top eight

Northern Light SinglePoint9 of 140Not among the top eight

Evalueserve5 of 140Not among the top eight

Market Logic5 of 140Not among the top eight

Similarweb5 of 140Not among the top eight

Stravito5 of 140Not among the top eight

WatchMyCompetitor5 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Valona Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Valona Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

alpha-sense.com8

contify.com8

klue.com8

pipeline.zoominfo.com8

northernlight.com7

gartner.com6

guideflow.com6

valonaintelligence.comYour site6

demandbase.com5

quid.com5

Sixty-one of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Valona Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/market-intelligence-tools6

alpha-sense.com/blog/product/competitive-intelligence-tools5

contify.com/resources/blog/best-competitive-intelligence-tools5

demandbase.com/blog/market-intelligence-tools5

gartner.com/reviews/market/competitive-and-market-intelligence-tools4

guideflow.com/blog/best-competitive-intelligence-tools4

northernlight.com/blog/the-12-best-competitive-and-market-intelligence-platforms-in-20264

quid.com/knowledge-hub/resource-library/blog/best-market-intelligence-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

valonaintelligence.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Valona Intelligence takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 17%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “market intelligence platform”

Position for “best market intelligence platform”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 39 of 172 in market intelligence

Segment leader

17%

Apollo.io

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: in 14 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Valona Intelligence

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Valona Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Valona Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Valona Intelligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Valona Intelligence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Valona Intelligence, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.