Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 69 of 107, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedMatrix
9Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Matrix was named 4 times in In-app messaging, where Intercom led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business70 of 108
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market36 of 105
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise30 of 98
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In in-app messaging · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Matrix for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 36 of 105 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Matrix held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · In-app messaging · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 29 → 34 of 96
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 → 28 of 97
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In-app messaging | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 36 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Matrix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Matrix across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Look instead for flat-rate, open-source, or self-hosted alternatives (like Matrix, Ethora, or Chat-SDK).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · In-app messaging · negative prompt · alternative
“Full self-hosted chat servers | Supports in-app via SDKs; unlimited users; host on cheap VPS (~$5/mo).” Grok 4.20 · In-app messaging · budget prompt · alternative
“Matrix/Element (federated, open standard)” Kimi K2 · In-app messaging · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“self-hosting an open-source chat framework like Matrix or Rocket.Chat is the ultimate budget move” Gemini 3.5 Flash · In-app messaging · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Matrix, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Matrix was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Matrix, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Matrix was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Matrix. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Matrix and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ethora.com6
trtc.io5
contus.com4
getstream.io4
productfruits.com4
cometchat.com3
dupple.com3
onesignal.com3
pushwoosh.com3
reddit.com3
Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Matrix came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on matrixflows.com
236
subdomains included
Content
181
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
15 · 9
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 122 | 6 | 2026-08-29 | ||
| Comparison | 41 | 3 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Case study | 15 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2025-08-18 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 1 | 2026-08-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-29Product adoption metrics that predict renewal blog
- 2026-08-25Customer operations team structure blog
- 2026-08-25Digital customer success automation guide blog
- 2026-08-25Gross revenue retention vs net retention comparison
- 2026-08-17Customer success team structure blog
- 2026-08-11Customer success metrics that matter blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page matrixflows.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Matrix
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Matrix; a claim can dispute any of them.
Matrix/Element 1Matrix/Synapse 1
Follow Matrix
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Matrix is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Matrix is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI knowledge enablement and support
- For
- customers, partners, and employees
- Price stated
- Unlimited users · No per-seat pricing · No per-resolution fees matrixflows.com
- Starting price
- 0 matrixflows.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free matrixflows.com
- Integrations claimed
- 1000 matrixflows.com
- Customers named
- Global Electronics CompanySalesforce
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Matrix's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: matrixflows.com, matrixflows.com/pricing, matrixflows.com/solutions/custom-apps, matrixflows.com/customers, matrixflows.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Matrix's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Matrix, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Matrix by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Matrix is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Matrix, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.