GTM AI Index

Index › Products › MagicPost · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

MagicPost

6Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MagicPost was named 2 times in Employee advocacy, where DSMN8 led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business26 of 63

under the label threshold

Mid-market32 of 64

under the label threshold

Enterprise42 of 55

under the label threshold

In employee advocacy · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MagicPost for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee advocacy platforms	Marketing	0%	32 of 64	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by DSMN8 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MagicPost yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MagicPost across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: B2B Go-To-Market (GTM) teams, founders, and sales teams who want to build authentic personal brands on LinkedIn.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee advocacy · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MagicPost, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MagicPost was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DSMN86 of 60Not among the top eight

EveryoneSocial5 of 61Not among the top eight

Sociabble5 of 60Not among the top eight

GaggleAMP4 of 60Not among the top eight

Hootsuite Amplify4 of 60Not among the top eight

Sprout Social Employee Advocacy4 of 60Not among the top eight

Oktopost3 of 60Not among the top eight

PostBeyond3 of 60Not among the top eight

Sociuu2 of 61Not among the top eight

Haiilo2 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MagicPost. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named MagicPost and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

magicpost.inYour site6

supergrow.ai6

guideflow.com5

dsmn8.com4

flockler.com3

g2.com3

learn.g2.com3

postbeam.ai3

blog.gaggleamp.com2

blog.hootsuite.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming MagicPost came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

magicpost.in/blog/employee-advocacy-software6

guideflow.com/blog/best-employee-advocacy-software-tools5

supergrow.ai/blog/employee-advocacy-tools5

learn.g2.com/best-employee-advocacy-software3

postbeam.ai/blog/best-employee-advocacy-tools3

connectsafely.ai/articles/everyonesocial-alternatives-employee-advocacy-20262

dsmn8.com/blog/how-to-choose-the-best-employee-advocacy-platform2

flockler.com/blog/best-employee-advocacy-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

magicpost.in ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, MagicPost takes 0% of first choices and DSMN8 takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee advocacy platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best employee advocacy platform”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 32 of 64 in employee advocacy

Segment leader

21%

DSMN8

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 6 answers
Its own site cited: in 6 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow MagicPost

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MagicPost's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MagicPost, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MagicPost by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where MagicPost is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name MagicPost, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.