GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › LinkJolt · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

LinkJolt

15Judge labels

5First choices

0Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LinkJolt was named 5 times in Affiliate, where PartnerStack led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business7 of 109

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 87

under the label threshold

Enterprise8 of 69

under the label threshold

In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LinkJolt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	4%	6 of 87	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LinkJolt yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LinkJolt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labels5

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LinkJolt ($19.99, 0% fees) offer the best balance of cost and functionality for a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice

“1. LinkJolt - Best Overall Value - Price: $19.99/month” Mistral Small · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice

“LinkJolt is a low-cost SaaS option at $19.99/month with 0% transaction fees” Perplexity Sonar · Affiliate · budget prompt · alternative

“For SaaS subscriptions: LinkJolt or Rewardful (Stripe-focused)” MiniMax M2.5 · Affiliate · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LinkJolt, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkJolt was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Rewardful11 of 151Not in the top three

Tapfiliate10 of 153Not in the top three

PartnerStack10 of 150Not in the top three

impact.com10 of 150Not in the top three

Refersion7 of 150Not in the top three

FirstPromoter6 of 150Not in the top three

Post Affiliate Pro6 of 150Not in the top three

GoAffPro4 of 153Not in the top three

AffiliateWP3 of 150Not in the top three

Amazon Associates3 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkJolt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 15 answers that named LinkJolt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

digistore24.com1

flowlu.com1

funnelish.com1

getresponse.com1

hostinger.com1

idevaffiliate.com1

influencermarketinghub.com1

info.poonno.com1

landerlab.io1

linkjolt.ioYour site1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming LinkJolt came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

digistore24.com/blog/best-affiliate-networks-beginners1

flowlu.com/blog/finances/best-affiliate-programs1

funnelish.com/blog/best-affiliate-marketing-platforms1

getresponse.com/blog/best-affiliate-programs-for-beginners1

hostinger.com/tutorials/best-affiliate-networks1

idevaffiliate.com/blog/best-affiliate-software-for-small-business1

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-software-platforms1

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-websites1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkJolt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkJolt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linkjolt.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.