GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › GoAffPro · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

GoAffPro

15Judge labels
11First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Affiliate for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 87 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named GoAffPro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Affiliate and partner managementPartner and channel11%4 of 870%7under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel2%16 of 1070%1under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GoAffPro yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GoAffPro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash20002
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained12 labels11
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“GoAffPro is the strongest budget-friendly option for a Shopify store because it offers a free way to start testing affiliates” Perplexity Sonar · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice
“GoAffPro stands out as the best affiliate marketing platform for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice
“If you run an online retail store, GoAffPro is widely considered the best budget-friendly option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Referrals · budget prompt · first choice
“My top overall recommendation: ... GoAffPro (free to start on Shopify/WooCommerce)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Affiliate · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GoAffPro, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoAffPro was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Rewardful9 of 150Not in the top three
UpPromote9 of 150Not in the top three
FirstPromoter7 of 151Not in the top three
Refersion7 of 150Not in the top three
Trackdesk7 of 150Not in the top three
PartnerStack6 of 151Not in the top three
AffiliateWP5 of 150Not in the top three
impact.com5 of 150Not in the top three
Amazon Associates4 of 151Not in the top three
Awin4 of 150Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoAffPro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 15 answers that named GoAffPro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getresponse.com2
linkjolt.io2
tapfiliate.com2
blog.hubspot.com1
digistore24.com1
flowlu.com1
funnelish.com1
hostinger.com1
idevaffiliate.com1
influencermarketinghub.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming GoAffPro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoAffPro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoAffPro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at goaffpro.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack