Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 26 of 56
2 categories · Named, not rankedAffiliateWP
6Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AffiliateWP was named 2 times in Affiliate and 1 other category, where PartnerStack led with 49%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 57
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market29 of 94
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise38 of 48
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AffiliateWP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliate and partner management | Partner and channel | 0% | 29 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 42 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AffiliateWP held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Affiliate · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 → 26 of 90
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 63 → 36 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Affiliate | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 29 of 94 |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 124, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AffiliateWP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AffiliateWP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AffiliateWP (WordPress-Based, Ultra-Affordable)... Super cheap, easy setup” Grok 4.20 · Channel marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for WordPress & WooCommerce Sites” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AffiliateWP, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AffiliateWP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AffiliateWP, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AffiliateWP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AffiliateWP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named AffiliateWP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
postaffiliatepro.com3
shopify.com3
apps.shopify.com2
hostinger.com2
rewardful.com2
youtube.com2
admitad.com1
advertisepurple.com1
affiliate-programs.biz1
affiliatewp.comYour site1
Seventeen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming AffiliateWP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on affiliatewp.com
2,750
subdomains included
Content
426
counted in the table below
Documentation
269
Product · Integration
13 · 38
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 371 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | Affiliate, SEO | |
| Comparison | 19 | 0 | 2025-01-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 1 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 6 | 1 | 2027-08-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 5 | 0 | 2020-12-15 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2021-08-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2024-12-23 | ||
| Case study | 1 | 0 | 2019-04-23 |
Most recent
- 2027-08-28Affsummit conference or event
- 2026-08-20What is affiliatewp glossary or explainer
- 2026-06-30Pay affiliates local currency blog
- 2026-06-29How to pay affiliates with store credit blog
- 2026-06-28How to pay your affiliates in wordpress the complete guide blog
- 2026-06-18Pay affiliates their way blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page affiliatewp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow AffiliateWP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AffiliateWP is its own company.ShowHide
The company
AffiliateWP is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AffiliateWP is the easiest and best affiliate management plugin for WordPress.
- For
- business owners, bloggers, designers, developers, and basically everyone else
- Price stated
- 149.50 affiliatewp.com
- Starting price
- 149.50 affiliatewp.com
- Free plan or trial
- We do not offer a trial affiliatewp.com
- Integrations claimed
- 29 affiliatewp.com · 20 affiliatewp.com/pricing · 28 affiliatewp.com/features/easy-setup pages disagree
- Customers named
- Paul JarvisJames JonesLee AdamsSébastien DumontMatt GibbsJonathan ChristopherAdam W. WarnerFooPlugins
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What AffiliateWP's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: affiliatewp.com, affiliatewp.com/pricing, affiliatewp.com/features/easy-setup, affiliatewp.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AffiliateWP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AffiliateWP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AffiliateWP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AffiliateWP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AffiliateWP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.