Every category where a model named Leadpipe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity resolution	GTM data and infrastructure	6%	7 of 151	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Leadpipe yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Leadpipe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels5

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Leadpipe at $147/month if you need API access and intent data. Both offer excellent value” Mistral Small · Identity · budget prompt · first choice

“Leadpipe is the cheapest-looking general self-serve option shown” Perplexity Sonar · Identity · budget prompt · first choice

“⭐ Top Recommendation ... Start with Leadpipe at $147/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Identity · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with CustomerLabs ($129/mo) or Leadpipe ($147/mo)” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Leadpipe, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leadpipe was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LiveRamp16 of 191Not in the top three

FullContact13 of 191Not in the top three

Amperity12 of 191Not in the top three

CustomerLabs 1PD Ops11 of 192Not in the top three

Experian9 of 190Not in the top three

Prospeo8 of 191Not in the top three

RB2B8 of 190Not in the top three

Segment7 of 190Not in the top three

Hightouch6 of 190Not in the top three

TransUnion6 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leadpipe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 19 answers that named Leadpipe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkthat.ai2

directmail.io2

g2.com2

gitnux.org2

guideflow.com2

leadpipe.comYour site2

opensend.com2

prospeo.io2

sourceforge.net2

tilores.io2

Eighteen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Leadpipe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-identity-resolution-tools2

directmail.io/blog/best-identity-resolution-platforms-20262

g2.com/categories/identity-resolution2

g2.com/discussions/what-identity-resolution-software-works-best-for-a-marketing-team-that-2

guideflow.com/blog/identity-resolution-software2

leadpipe.com/blog/identity-resolution-api-comparison-20262

opensend.com/post/identity-resolution-platforms-ecommerce-brands2

prospeo.io/s/identity-resolution-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leadpipe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leadpipe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leadpipe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.