AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › TransUnion · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

TransUnion

15Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. TransUnion was named 8 times in Attribution & MMM and 1 other category, where Dreamdata led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TransUnion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Attribution and marketing mix modelingMarketing0%41 of 12317%6under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Data clean roomsGTM data and infrastructure0%28 of 1000%2under 10 labels · led by Snowflake Data Clean Rooms at 19%

Movement

Since September 2026, TransUnion held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Attribution & MMM · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 of 112, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 46 → 31 of 101

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Attribution & MMM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 41 of 123, unchanged
Data clean rooms0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 28 of 100, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated TransUnion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Combines online and offline data for a unified view of marketing effectiveness, favored by large advertisers.” Mistral Small · Attribution & MMM · comparative prompt · alternative
“These credit bureaus offer vertically integrated clean room solutions” Mistral Small · Data clean rooms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Very slow feedback loops (models can take 8–12 weeks to deliver) and highly expensive.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Attribution & MMM · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TransUnion, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TransUnion was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Analytic Partners12 of 157Not among the top eight
Ipsos MMA11 of 150Not among the top eight
OptiMine11 of 150Not among the top eight
Adobe Analytics9 of 152Not among the top eight
Google Meridian9 of 152Not among the top eight
Rockerbox7 of 151Not among the top eight
Dreamdata7 of 150Not among the top eight
Measured7 of 150Not among the top eight
HockeyStack6 of 150Not among the top eight
Meta Robyn6 of 150Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TransUnion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named TransUnion and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

transunion.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TransUnion takes 0% of first choices and Dreamdata takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best marketing attribution and marketing mix modeling platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
823,000 a month (“transunion”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
7,321 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,404,754 a month
Searches its site ranks for
35,664 · 5,164 in the top three
Sites linking to it
35,868
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 16 clicks and $770 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
95+ ads · 88 text, 5 image, 2 video · 95 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2025, as Transunion Interactive, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 94 in the year, 1 before. 25 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 41 of 123 in Attribution & MMM
Segment leader
27%
Dreamdata
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
15 answers
Its own site cited
in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on transunion.com
1,373
subdomains included
Content
1,363
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,288112026-09-28
Conference or event5812026-09-10
Comparison912026-07-16
Report or ebook402025-10-02
Webinar or virtual event302024-08-07
Template or tool102015-06-30
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page transunion.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as TransUnion

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TransUnion; a claim can dispute any of them.
Neustar/TransUnion 1TransUnion (formerly Neustar MarketShare) 1

Follow TransUnion

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

TransUnion.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Chicago, United States
Founded
1968
Ownership
Public, TRU on New York Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Free TransUnion® credit report & score. Free credit monitoring, alerts and personalized offers. All free, all in 1.
For
Consumer
Price stated
Free transunion.com
Starting price
null transunion.com
Free plan or trial
No credit card required transunion.com
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What TransUnion's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: transunion.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TransUnion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TransUnion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TransUnion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where TransUnion is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name TransUnion, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at transunion.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.