| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 127 of 151 | 40% | 15 | criticized challenger |
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 0% | 30 of 104 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“In a regulated industry (finance, insurance)? → Experian or InfoSum” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“3. Experian ⭐ *Best for offline plus online unification*” Mistral Small · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“LiveRamp, Experian, or TransUnion are best for enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Regulated industries (finance, healthcare)” Kimi K2 · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Experian — Repeated data breaches, regulatory action from the CFPB, and poor consumer complaint resolution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms (LiveRamp, Amperity, Experian): $50K+/year - Not budget-friendly” Mistral Small · Identity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Red Flags to Avoid: Consumer-focused platforms (Experian, Acxiom) - poor B2B coverage” Mistral Small · Identity · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“avoid these for limited budgets” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 49 answers that named Experian and are not a share of its labels.
Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Experian came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Experian's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Experian, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at experian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.