GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Experian · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Experian

49Judge labels
1First choices
18Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Identity for enterprise buyers
Rank 127 of 151 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Experian for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Identity resolutionGTM data and infrastructure0%127 of 15140%15criticized challenger
CRM data quality and deduplicationRevenue operations0%30 of 1040%3under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Experian yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Experian across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01124
DeepSeek V4 Flash01214
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX00112
MiniMax M2.501012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative24 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“In a regulated industry (finance, insurance)? → Experian or InfoSum” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“3. Experian ⭐ *Best for offline plus online unification*” Mistral Small · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“LiveRamp, Experian, or TransUnion are best for enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Regulated industries (finance, healthcare)” Kimi K2 · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Experian — Repeated data breaches, regulatory action from the CFPB, and poor consumer complaint resolution.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms (LiveRamp, Amperity, Experian): $50K+/year - Not budget-friendly” Mistral Small · Identity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Red Flags to Avoid: Consumer-focused platforms (Experian, Acxiom) - poor B2B coverage” Mistral Small · Identity · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“avoid these for limited budgets” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Experian, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Experian was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LiveRamp41 of 4914Not in the top three
TransUnion28 of 490Not in the top three
Amperity26 of 492Not in the top three
Acxiom24 of 490Not in the top three
Tealium22 of 490Not in the top three
FullContact20 of 491Not in the top three
Segment19 of 491Not in the top three
Hightouch18 of 493Not in the top three
mParticle16 of 490Not in the top three
CustomerLabs 1PD Ops10 of 495Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Experian. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 49 answers that named Experian and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

devopsschool.com6
guideflow.com6
tilores.io5
checkthat.ai3
customerlabs.com3
dataladder.com3
g2.com3
gitnux.org3
prospeo.io3
trustradius.com3

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Experian came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Experian.
Website
experian.com
Headquarters
Dublin, Ireland
Founded
1980
Employees
about 17,000 (2015)
Ownership
Public, EXPN on London Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Experian's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Experian, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at experian.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack