GTM AI Index
Index › Vendors › Kickflip · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Kickflip

17Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in CPQ for small business buyers
Rank 16 of 73 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business7 of 71
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market16 of 73
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In cpq · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kickflip for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CPQRevenue operations0%16 of 730%3under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 62%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kickflip yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kickflip across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For ecommerce businesses: Kickflip ($59/month + add-on) offers visual configuration tools.” Mistral Small · CPQ · budget prompt · alternative
“Kickflip - a visual, ecommerce-first CPQ for businesses selling customizable products online.” Llama 4 Maverick · CPQ · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for E-commerce-style CPQ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CPQ · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kickflip, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kickflip was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PandaDoc16 of 178Not in the top three
QuoteWerks12 of 174Not in the top three
Salesforce CPQ11 of 170Not in the top three
HubSpot Commerce Hub8 of 174Not in the top three
DealHub8 of 171Not in the top three
SAP CPQ7 of 170Not in the top three
Proposify6 of 171Not in the top three
Dock6 of 170Not in the top three
Oracle CPQ6 of 170Not in the top three
Conga CPQ4 of 170Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kickflip. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 17 answers that named Kickflip and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gokickflip.com3
cincom.com2
guideflow.com2
slashdot.org2
softwareadvice.com2
aktivsoftware.com1
blog.alguna.com1
businesswith.com1
cpqdevelopers.com1
dgt27.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Kickflip came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gokickflip.com/blog/best-cpq-software-for-small-business3
cincom.com/blog/cpq/best-cpq-tools2
guideflow.com/blog/best-cpq-software2
slashdot.org/software/cpq/f-small-business2
softwareadvice.com/cpq2
aktivsoftware.com/best-cpq-software-for-manufacturers-in-20261
blog.alguna.com/best-cpq-software1
businesswith.com/cpq1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kickflip's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kickflip, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kickflip.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack