Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 18 of 76
2 categories · Named, not rankedInviteReferrals
20Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. InviteReferrals was named 8 times in Referrals and 1 other category, where PartnerStack led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 83
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market27 of 112
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise31 of 69
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In referrals · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named InviteReferrals for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 27 of 112 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Loyalty, advocacy and referrals | Marketing | 0% | 34 of 110 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, InviteReferrals held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Referrals · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 of 106, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 → 21 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Referrals | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 27 of 112 |
| Loyalty | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 85 → 34 of 110 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated InviteReferrals across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated InviteReferrals across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Safer bets: Stick to well-reviewed ones like InviteReferrals (4.9/5)” Grok 4.20 · Loyalty · negative prompt · first choice
“frequently cited as a top choice for B2B referral program software” Mistral Small · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Offers a 14-day free trial and is praised for easy social sharing.” Mistral Small · Referrals · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as InviteReferrals, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and InviteReferrals was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as InviteReferrals, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and InviteReferrals was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named InviteReferrals. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named InviteReferrals and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
openloyalty.io11
growsurf.com10
prefinery.com9
moosend.com8
thecmo.com8
getapp.com7
invitereferrals.comYour site7
refgrow.com7
checkthat.ai6
influencermarketinghub.com6
Seventy-two of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming InviteReferrals came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
invitereferrals.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, InviteReferrals takes 0% of first choices and PartnerStack takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
invitereferrals.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, InviteReferrals takes 0% of first choices and PartnerStack takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “referral program software”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best referral program software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“invitereferrals”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,878 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,875 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,085
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 112 in referrals
Segment leader
22%
PartnerStack
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on invitereferrals.com
150
subdomains included
Content
123
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 112 | 0 | 2026-03-31 | Referrals | |
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2020-12-31 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2013-09-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2021-11-05 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 0 | 2021-06-30 |
Most recent
- 2026-03-31How to build a location independent business from scratch blog
- 2025-12-30How websets help optimize referral programs and improve conversions blog
- 2025-12-16How physical signage can spark word of mouth and drive more referrals blog
- 2025-09-185 low stress video formats for consistently growing your viewership blog
- 2025-09-16Turning customers into advocates proven referral marketing tactics that drive real growth blog
- 2025-08-27The modern creators toolkit balancing strategic reach and digital well being on tiktok blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page invitereferrals.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow InviteReferrals
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
InviteReferrals is its own company.ShowHide
The company
InviteReferrals is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- InviteReferrals is the best referral software for mobile apps and websites.
- For
- businesses using websites, social media, and mobile apps
- Free plan or trial
- Start your 14 days FREE trial now! invitereferrals.com
- Customers named
- itimesA healthcare brand for womenLenskartAAPHowdooHealthkartChimcardRay, Foursquare
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What InviteReferrals's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: invitereferrals.com, invitereferrals.com/blog/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when InviteReferrals's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as InviteReferrals, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for InviteReferrals by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where InviteReferrals is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name InviteReferrals, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.