Every category where a model named Inkit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Print	Marketing	0%	15 of 58	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Postalytics at 54%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Inkit yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Inkit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Inkit or PFL may be better if you need more sophisticated document generation” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · scale prompt · alternative

“Inkit (Best for Enterprise Revenue Teams)” Kimi K2 · Direct mail · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Developer-First & "API-First" Platforms (e.g., Lob, Inkit)... Why to be cautious (especially if you are a non-technical marketer)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct mail · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Inkit, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Inkit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lob19 of 217Not in the top three

Postalytics18 of 212Not in the top three

Sendoso18 of 211Not in the top three

PostGrid16 of 213Not in the top three

PFL11 of 211Not in the top three

Click2Mail10 of 210Not in the top three

Reachdesk9 of 210Not in the top three

PostPilot6 of 211Not in the top three

Stannp5 of 211Not in the top three

Postie5 of 210Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Inkit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 21 answers that named Inkit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

businessage.com1

emailtooltester.com1

g2.com1

gartner.com1

gitnux.org1

guideflow.com1

linkedin.com1

lob.com1

postalytics.com1

postgrid.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Inkit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

businessage.com/post/5-best-direct-mail-automation-software-platforms1

emailtooltester.com/en/blog/email-automation-software1

g2.com/categories/direct-mail-automation1

gartner.com/reviews/market/direct-mail-automation-software1

gitnux.org/best/direct-mail-management-software1

gitnux.org/service/automated-mailing1

guideflow.com/blog/direct-mail-automation-software1

linkedin.com/products/categories/direct-mail-automation-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Inkit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Inkit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at inkit.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.