Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 31 → 18 of 73
2 categories · RankedDirectMail.io
30Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Direct mail for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 68 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 75
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 68
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise12 of 56
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In direct mail · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named DirectMail.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing | 0% | 18 of 68 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Postalytics at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | |
| Direct mail and gifting platforms | Marketing | 0% | 19 of 90 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Sendoso at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, DirectMail.io held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Direct mail · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 17 of 66
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 13 of 56
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct mail | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 18 of 68 |
| Direct mail & gifting | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 19 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated DirectMail.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated DirectMail.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose DirectMail.io if: You need comprehensive postal services including advanced address verification and sorting.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct mail · comparative prompt · alternative
“Full omnichannel direct mail stack (postal + digital) | DirectMail.io” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail & gifting · comparative prompt · alternative
“Its strength lies in identity resolution and true omnichannel tracking” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct mail · comparative prompt · alternative
“PFL/DirectMail.io for hybrid gifting + direct mail services” Grok 4.20 · Direct mail & gifting · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as DirectMail.io, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DirectMail.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as DirectMail.io, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DirectMail.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DirectMail.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named DirectMail.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
directmail.ioYour site19
guideflow.com18
postalytics.com17
lob.com16
gitnux.org13
thecmo.com12
postgrid.com11
worldmetrics.org11
g2.com9
mailmodo.com8
115 of the 134 domain citations in answers naming DirectMail.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
directmail.io ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, DirectMail.io takes 0% of first choices and Postalytics takes 44%.ShowHide
Search and answers
directmail.io ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, DirectMail.io takes 0% of first choices and Postalytics takes 44%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “direct mail automation platform”
8
Position for “best direct mail automation platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 30 a month (“directmail.io”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,748 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 489 · 3 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 301
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 68 in direct mail
Segment leader
44%
Postalytics
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on directmail.io
382
subdomains included
Content
253
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
35 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 196 | 0 | 2026-06-14 | Identity, Direct mail | |
| Comparison | 30 | 0 | 2026-06-14 | Direct mail | |
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | Identity | |
| Case study | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | Direct mail |
Most recent
- 2026-06-14B2b direct mail vs linkedin ads cac 2026 comparison
- 2026-06-14Direct mail platform pricing volume breakeven 2026 blog
- 2026-06-14Direct mail roi holdout cell attribution methodology blog
- 2026-06-14Eddm vs targeted direct mail home services 2026 comparison
- 2026-06-06Mailstream os blog
- 2026-05-22Print and mail services vs in house which wins comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page directmail.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name identity (11); 10 name its categories the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as DirectMail.io
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as DirectMail.io; a claim can dispute any of them.
PFL/DirectMail.io 1
Follow DirectMail.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
DirectMail.io is its own company.ShowHide
The company
DirectMail.io is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The all-in-one direct mail platform for printers, agencies, and brands.
- For
- Printers, agencies, and brands
- Price stated
- DirectMail.io has three plans. Business is for SMBs. Reseller is for agencies and printers offering direct mail to clients. Enterprise is for corporate and franchise organizations. Annual billing saves up to 15%. Contact us for exact pricing based on your volume and needs. directmail.io
- Starting price
- 0 directmail.io
- Free plan or trial
- Book a demo directmail.io
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2 certifiedUSPS Innovation Award 2023SOC 2 Type 2HIPAA-ready with BAACCPA/CPRA compliantGDPR postureUSPS-certified processingUSPS-certified standardization
- Hosting
- Web, CloudThe platform is processed in the United States
- Customers named
- CMR Construction & RoofingChick-fil-ACMR Construction
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What DirectMail.io's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: directmail.io, directmail.io/pricing, directmail.io/security, directmail.io/features, directmail.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DirectMail.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DirectMail.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DirectMail.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where DirectMail.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name DirectMail.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.