AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Informatica MDM · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Informatica MDM

37Judge labels
0First choices
13Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Identity for enterprise buyers
Rank 40 of 140 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Informatica MDM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity resolutionGTM data and infrastructure0%40 of 14014%7under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data management platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%137 of 15933%3under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Informatica MDM held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Identity · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 100 → 119 of 125
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 58 → 35 of 131
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 28 of 89

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Identity0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 58 → 40 of 140
DMP0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 50 → 137 of 159

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Informatica MDM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01012
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000202
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00112
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative12 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for governance / enterprise-style data management: Informatica or Treasure Data” GPT-5.4 mini · Identity · direct prompt · alternative
“Rule-based platforms (Informatica MDM)—gives you control over how records merge” Kimi K2 · Identity · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“many reviews cite high total cost of ownership, steep learning curves, and clunky UI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DMP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best enterprise-grade identity resolution, but expensive” GPT-5.4 mini · Identity · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Informatica MDM, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Informatica MDM was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LiveRamp Identity Resolution24 of 374Not among the top eight
Salesforce Data Cloud21 of 373Not among the top eight
Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution16 of 372Not among the top eight
Amperity14 of 371Not among the top eight
Acxiom Real Identity11 of 370Not among the top eight
Tealium11 of 370Not among the top eight
FullContact10 of 373Not among the top eight
Senzing10 of 370Not among the top eight
Twilio Segment Unify8 of 371Not among the top eight
Adobe Real-Time CDP8 of 370Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Informatica MDM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 37 answers that named Informatica MDM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com16
guideflow.com16
gtm-ai-index.com13
prospeo.io13
devopsschool.com12
liveramp.com11
hightouch.com10
oppora.ai10
redpointglobal.com9
scmgalaxy.com9

119 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Informatica MDM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

informatica.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Informatica MDM takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “identity resolution platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best identity resolution platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“informatica mdm”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
29 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 73,321 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,447 · 1,061 in the top three
Sites linking to it
12,870
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 112 text, 8 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as Informatica LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 113 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 40 of 140 in identity
Segment leader
12%
Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
37 answers
Its own site cited
in 36 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on informatica.com
10,003
subdomains included
Content
1,279
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
162 · 22
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog59802023-04-27
Podcast or video288undated
News or press14202026-05-01
Glossary or explainer12312026-07-08
Case study7802025-06-24
Conference or event1732026-10-27
Comparison1402023-09-13
Report or ebook9undated
Webinar or virtual event702024-10-09
Template or tool302024-08-12

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on informatica.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page informatica.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Informatica MDM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Informatica MDM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Informatica 5Informatica MDM / PowerCenter 1

Follow Informatica MDM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Informatica is the company behind Informatica MDM.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Redwood City, United States
Founded
1993
Ownership
Public, INFA on New York Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Informatica from Salesforce is recognized as a Leader, positioned highest in Ability to Execute.
Customers named
yamaha-corpCitizensjetblueschneider-electricsTelus
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Informatica MDM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: informatica.com/magic-quadrant-mdm.html, informatica.com/blogs/master-data-management.html, informatica.com/products/master-data-management.html, informatica.com/blogs/importance-of-data-security-in-master-data-management.html, informatica.com/blogs/a-new-operating-model-for-data-informatica-mdm-mcp-server.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Informatica MDM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Informatica MDM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Informatica MDM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Informatica MDM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Informatica MDM, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at informatica.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.