AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Acxiom Real Identity · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Acxiom Real Identity

36Judge labels
0First choices
15Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Identity for mid-market buyers
Rank 118 of 140 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Acxiom Real Identity →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Acxiom Real Identity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity resolutionGTM data and infrastructure0%118 of 14038%13criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Acxiom Real Identity held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Identity · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 99 → 114 of 125
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 105 of 131
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 39 of 89

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Identity0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 24 → 118 of 140

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Acxiom Real Identity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00022
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501113
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00112

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Acxiom Real Identity resolves identity in a protected cloud environment with zero PII movement” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Real Identity platform with 50+ digital and offline data attributes” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Privacy complaints... Facing lawsuits alleging unauthorized data collection and sharing (Roberson v. Acxiom LLC, 2026)” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Same corporate lineage as LiveRamp (data broker heritage) - Criticized for similar privacy and transparency concerns” Kimi K2 · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid platforms like LiveRamp, Acxiom, or Salesforce Data 360” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · budget prompt · hard negative
“Privacy International filed GDPR complaints against Acxiom ... Transparency issues: Their data sourcing and matching methodologies have historically been opaque.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Acxiom Real Identity, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Acxiom Real Identity was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LiveRamp Identity Resolution33 of 369Not among the top eight
Experian Identity Resolution19 of 360Not among the top eight
Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution18 of 364Not among the top eight
Amperity18 of 362Not among the top eight
Salesforce Data Cloud16 of 362Not among the top eight
Twilio Segment Unify13 of 362Not among the top eight
TransUnion TruAudience12 of 360Not among the top eight
Informatica MDM11 of 360Not among the top eight
Adobe Real-Time CDP10 of 360Not among the top eight
FullContact9 of 362Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Acxiom Real Identity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 36 answers that named Acxiom Real Identity and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

acxiom.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Acxiom Real Identity takes 0% of first choices and Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “identity resolution platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best identity resolution platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90 a month (“acxiom real identity”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 11,330 a month
Searches its site ranks for
766 · 137 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,013
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 118 of 140 in identity
Segment leader
12%
Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
36 answers
Its own site cited
in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on acxiom.com
481
subdomains included
Content
241
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
36 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog111undatedIdentity, CDP
News or press9732026-09-21Identity, CDP
Case study23undated
Conference or event6undated
Comparison3undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on acxiom.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page acxiom.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Acxiom Real Identity

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Acxiom Real Identity; a claim can dispute any of them.
Acxiom 10Acxiom (IPG) 2

Follow Acxiom Real Identity

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Acxiom is the company behind Acxiom Real Identity.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
acxiom.com
Headquarters
Conway, United States
Founded
1969
Ownership
Part of Interpublic Group of Companies

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
your connected identity foundation, unifying your customer data across channels with more than 10K unique insights to fuel truly personalized experiences
For
brands
Customers named
HeathrowGuitar Centercredit card marketer
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Acxiom Real Identity's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: acxiom.com, acxiom.com/solutions/ai, acxiom.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Acxiom Real Identity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Acxiom Real Identity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Acxiom Real Identity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Acxiom Real Identity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Acxiom Real Identity, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at acxiom.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.