Every category where a model named iCapture for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Event lead capture apps	Marketing	6%	5 of 70	19%	36	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for iCapture yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated iCapture across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	3	1	1	5
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	2	1	1	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	2	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct18 labels4

Paraphrase19 labels6

Comparative24 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels4

Scale-constrained14 labels1

Negative19 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative107 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“iCapture | Enterprise teams with 10+ events/year | Proven offline reliability, strong ROI metrics” Kimi K2 · Event lead capture · scale prompt · first choice

“prioritize "universal" third-party lead capture apps (like Blinq, Popl, iCapture, or Mobly)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event lead capture · negative prompt · first choice

“Need flexible trade-show capture across many events? Look at iCapture.” GPT-5.4 mini · Event lead capture · comparative prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with Blinq or iCapture” MiniMax M2.5 · Event lead capture · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“iCapture, Cvent LeadCapture, Whova and momencio's standard tier need organizer API / registration vendor access... That creates data ownership and consent ambiguity.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · negative prompt · soft negative

“iCapture has slightly lower average G2 ratings than other options and negative comments focus on their older UX and difficult setup process” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Event lead capture · negative prompt · soft negative

“iCapture, LeadCapture, Whova and momencio's standard tier all need the organizer's own system to work without one” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · scale prompt · soft negative

“High annual cost: ~$8,000/year pricing ... Overkill for: Smaller teams or occasional exhibitors” Kimi K2 · Event lead capture · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as iCapture, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and iCapture was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Blinq69 of 10722Compare →

Cvent LeadCapture65 of 1079Not among the top eight

Captello59 of 1079Not among the top eight

Popl49 of 1074Compare →

momencio46 of 1072Compare →

Mobly Capture43 of 10711Compare →

Wave Connect36 of 1077Compare →

BoothIQ27 of 1076Compare →

B2Brain24 of 1073Compare →

Whova22 of 1070Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iCapture. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 107 of the 107 answers that named iCapture and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blinq.me81

b2brain.com79

g2.com54

mobilocard.com50

mymanagementguide.com50

bizzabo.com40

wavecnct.com40

getmobly.com37

eventify.io31

accelevents.com29

491 of the 491 domain citations in answers naming iCapture came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blinq.me/blog/best-event-lead-capture-software-202663

mymanagementguide.com/top-event-lead-capture-platforms50

b2brain.com/blogs/best-app-for-events48

mobilocard.com/post/whats-the-best-event-lead-generation-software44

getmobly.com/post/best-event-lead-capture-app35

wavecnct.com/blogs/best-tools-lead-capture-trade-shows34

b2brain.com/blogs/lead-capture-app33

eventify.io/blog/best-lead-retrieval-software28

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

icapture.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, iCapture takes 6% of first choices and Blinq takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “event lead capture app”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best event lead capture app”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“icapture”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 36 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 161 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 7 · 2 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 875
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 70 in event lead capture

Segment leader

23%

Blinq

First choices: 15 across its categories
Named in: 107 answers
Its own site cited: in 107 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on icapture.com

2,944

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Conference or event	23	0	2020-03-18
Blog	7	0	2020-05-19
Case study	2	undated

Most recent

2020-05-19Why is everyone talking about small events blog
2020-04-16Eliminating manual lead entry with automation blog
2020-03-183 lessons the coronavirus teaches us about trade shows conference or event
2020-03-12Trade shows postponed were here for you conference or event
2020-03-047 lessons marvel teaches us about trade shows conference or event
2020-02-2620 your trade show leads conference or event

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page icapture.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as iCapture

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as iCapture; a claim can dispute any of them.

iCapture (by Cvent) 3iCapture (Cvent) 2Cvent LeadCapture / iCapture 1

Follow iCapture

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when iCapture's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as iCapture, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for iCapture by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where iCapture is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name iCapture, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.