AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Captello · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Captello

88Judge labels
10First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Event lead capture for enterprise buyers
Rank 11 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 28 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Captello →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In event lead capture · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Captello for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Event lead capture appsMarketing2%11 of 7011%28accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Captello yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Captello across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash03115
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2013105
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00202
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201203
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B10102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels2
Paraphrase13 labels3
Comparative23 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained12 labels4
Negative17 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wave Connect and Captello are the two named in the recent review as the only platforms backing their security posture with named, audited certifications.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Captello as the top trade show badge scanning and lead retrieval tool” Grok 4.20 · Event lead capture · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“compare Captello, particularly if enrichment, automated follow-up, and more extensive event workflows matter” GPT-6 Luna · Event lead capture · direct prompt · alternative
“Stick to G2/Capterra leaders: Blinq, Captello, Popl, Wave Connect (high ratings, security certs).” Grok 4.20 · Event lead capture · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Captello may not be the right choice for a leaner team focused on generating the maximum ROI from their events” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Event lead capture · negative prompt · soft negative
“user reviews consistently highlight a steep learning curve... some users have reported lag issues” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event lead capture · negative prompt · soft negative
“enterprise-grade features but demo-gated pricing” Mistral Small · Event lead capture · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Captello, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Captello was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
iCapture59 of 888Not among the top eight
Blinq55 of 8816Not among the top eight
Cvent LeadCapture49 of 886Not among the top eight
Popl44 of 886Not among the top eight
Mobly Capture39 of 8810Not among the top eight
momencio36 of 882Not among the top eight
Wave Connect27 of 883Not among the top eight
BoothIQ21 of 885Not among the top eight
B2Brain18 of 885Not among the top eight
Whova17 of 880Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Captello. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 88 of the 88 answers that named Captello and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blinq.me62
b2brain.com58
g2.com52
mymanagementguide.com40
bizzabo.com39
mobilocard.com39
captello.comYour site31
wavecnct.com30
eventify.io28
learn.g2.com27

375 of the 406 domain citations in answers naming Captello came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

captello.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Captello takes 2% of first choices and Blinq takes 23%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “event lead capture app”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best event lead capture app”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
720 a month (“captello”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 783 a month
Searches its site ranks for
146 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,166
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
78 ads · 45 text, 27 image, 6 video · 17 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2022, as Lead Liaison LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 36 in the year, 42 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 70 in event lead capture
Segment leader
23%
Blinq
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
88 answers
Its own site cited
in 88 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on captello.com
122
subdomains included
Content
43
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
29 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog2612026-09-22CRM, Enrichment
Comparison13undated
Conference or event1undated
Template or tool1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page captello.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Captello

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Captello's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Captello, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Captello by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Captello is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Captello, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at captello.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.