| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event lead capture apps | Marketing | 8% | 3 of 70 | 5% | 22 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Wave Connect and Captello are the two named in the recent review as the only platforms backing their security posture with named, audited certifications.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · negative prompt · first choice
“Better Alternatives to Consider ... Wave Connect — pay-per-lead model ($10/enriched lead), no per-user fees” Kimi K2 · Event lead capture · negative prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Wave Connect as the best default trade show badge scanning and lead retrieval tool” Perplexity Sonar · Event lead capture · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best lead capture software for trade shows in 2026: an AI Badge Scanner that works at any show” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Odd pricing structure ($10/lead); no handheld rental, app-only; not ideal for high-volume scanning.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Event lead capture · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 65 answers that named Wave Connect and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for Wave Connect, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wave Connect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wave Connect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Wave Connect by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Wave Connect is among the products AI models recommend first in Event lead capture apps this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.